Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Insurance (4)
- Liability (2)
- Life insurance (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Risk (2)
-
- Accident (1)
- Accident insurance (1)
- Accidental Means (1)
- Annuity (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Attorney-client contract (1)
- Automobile insurance (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Causality (1)
- Cause of action (1)
- Collateral source (1)
- Concurrent causation (1)
- Contingent fee contracts (1)
- Contract (1)
- Damage (1)
- Deceptive circular (1)
- Estate of Reilly v. Commissioner (1)
- FTC v. Travelers Health Association (1)
- Federal Trade Commission Act (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith (1)
- Foreign insurer (1)
- Indiana (1)
- Insurance companies (1)
- Insurance contract (1)
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federal Courts--Amount In Controversy--Aggregation Of Claims Against Co-Defendant Insurance Companies, Edward Andrew Zagula
Federal Courts--Amount In Controversy--Aggregation Of Claims Against Co-Defendant Insurance Companies, Edward Andrew Zagula
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insurance Law- Business And Investment Limitations - Authority Of Foreign Life Insurer To Acquire A Fire And Casualty Subsidiary, G. E. Oppenneer
Insurance Law- Business And Investment Limitations - Authority Of Foreign Life Insurer To Acquire A Fire And Casualty Subsidiary, G. E. Oppenneer
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a Connecticut life insurer, proposed to acquire a controlling stock interest in a fire and casualty insurance company. The New York Superintendent of Insurance, supported by the state Attorney General, advised that plaintiff would thereby disqualify itself from doing business in the state under the business and investment limitations of the Insurance Law. Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that its proposal was permissible. The supreme court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, granted defendant's cross-motion and dismissed the complaint; the appellate division affirmed. On appeal, held, reversed, three judges dissenting. The legislature did not intend to extend the …
Insurance -- 1961 Tennessee Survey, Robert N. Covington
Insurance -- 1961 Tennessee Survey, Robert N. Covington
Vanderbilt Law Review
The developments in the Tennessee law of insurance during the past year were important without being surprising. The various courts delivered opinions dealing with a number of the central issues in insurance law, especially in the field of risk control, and by and large followed the line of thinking established by past years. Many of the decisions are of less significance than one might suppose, because of their extreme involvement in particular fact situations.
Insurance—Foreign Life Insurer Licensed In State May Control Insurance Firms Engaged In Non-Life Business, Robert D. Stein
Insurance—Foreign Life Insurer Licensed In State May Control Insurance Firms Engaged In Non-Life Business, Robert D. Stein
Buffalo Law Review
Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. O'Connor, 8 N.Y.2d 359, 207 N.Y.S.2d 679 (1960).
Insurance—Rescission Of Automobile Insurance Policy Procured By Fraud, Robert E. Nicely
Insurance—Rescission Of Automobile Insurance Policy Procured By Fraud, Robert E. Nicely
Buffalo Law Review
Woodson v. New York City Housing Authority, 10 N.Y.2d 30, 217 N.Y.S.2d 31 (1961).
Insurance, Robert L. Taylor
Insurance, Robert L. Taylor
Washington Law Review
Covers recent laws on credit life, accident, and health insurance and on life insurance.
Contacts - Subrogation - Partial Subrogation Of A Cause Of Action For Personal Injuries, Jerome M. Salle
Contacts - Subrogation - Partial Subrogation Of A Cause Of Action For Personal Injuries, Jerome M. Salle
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, an incorporated home for the aged, provided all essential medical care to one of its residents under the provisions of a life-care contract between it and the resident. On the basis of a contract clause which purported to subrogate plaintiff to the right of the resident to recover medical expenses caused by the negligence of third parties, plaintiff brought an action to recover certain medical expenses incurred from the party who was allegedly responsible for the injuries and death of the resident. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint for failure to state a cause of action …
Concurrent Causation In Insurance Contracts, William Conant Brewer Jr.
Concurrent Causation In Insurance Contracts, William Conant Brewer Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A great deal of work and thought has been devoted to concurrent causation problems in the field of torts. Less attention has been paid to the insurance cases, and no serious effort has been made to formulate the separate rules applicable to them. It is the thesis of this article that concurrent causation problems which arise under an insurance contract must be handled somewhat differently from those which arise in connection with tort litigation, and that the tendency to borrow rules of law from the larger tort field and apply them to the smaller volume of insurance cases can only …
"Accident" And "Accidental Means" In Indiana
"Accident" And "Accidental Means" In Indiana
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Estate Tax - Marital Deduction - Annuity For Life With Guaranteed Certain Payments Not Divided Into Two Properties By Insurer's Accounting Treatment, William S. Bach
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, executor of decedent's estate, brought suit to recover an overpayment of federal estate tax. Decedent had purchased a life insurance policy and had elected an option under which proceeds would be paid to his wife in monthly payments for her life; however, the option also guaranteed a minimum of 240 payments. In the event the wife died before 240 payments were made, payments were to continue to decedent's daughter, or on the death of both wife and daughter, the commuted value of the remaining guaranteed payments would be paid in lump sum to the estate of the survivor. The …
Insurance Contracts: Methods Of Interpretation
Insurance Contracts: Methods Of Interpretation
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insurance-Regulation Under The Mccarran-Ferguson Act-Ftc Jurisdiction Not Ousted By A State Statute Proporting To Control Deceptive Advertising Mailed To Other States, Thomas D. Heekin
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner issued a cease-and-desist order prohibiting respondent from making statements in its advertising materials which violated the Federal Trade Commission Act. Respondent, a Nebraska health insurance company, mailed its circulars to residents of every state. The McCarran-Ferguson Act provides that "the Federal Trade Commission Act ... shall be applicable to the business of insurance to the extent that such business is not regulated by State law." A Nebraska statute prohibits an insurer domiciled there from engaging in unfair business practices in any state. In an action to set aside the FTC cease-and-desist order, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth …
Bankruptcy--Life Insurance--Trustee Not Entitled To Case Surrender Value Of Policy, Arthur Mark Recht
Bankruptcy--Life Insurance--Trustee Not Entitled To Case Surrender Value Of Policy, Arthur Mark Recht
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kimball: Insurance And Public Policy, Albert A. Ehrenzweig
Kimball: Insurance And Public Policy, Albert A. Ehrenzweig
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Insurance and Public Policy. By Spencer L. Kimball.
Pups, Plants And Package Policies - Or The Insurance Antitrust Exemption Re-Examined, Richard A. Wiley
Pups, Plants And Package Policies - Or The Insurance Antitrust Exemption Re-Examined, Richard A. Wiley
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insurance Company Interference In Personal Injury Law Practice, Sheldon E. Baskin
Insurance Company Interference In Personal Injury Law Practice, Sheldon E. Baskin
Cleveland State Law Review
The cloak of immunity that the insurance companies wear, and the fact that recently a trend has been noticed encouraging settlements, results in attorneys, finding their just fees diminished by the interference of third persons not in privity with the attorney-client contract, being compelled to find other means of redressing the wrongs thus perpetrated against them.