Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

“Ua Koe Ke Kuleana O Na Kanaka” (Reserving The Rights Of Native Tenants): Integrating Kuleana Rights And Land Trust Priorities In Hawai`I, Jocelyn B. Garovoy Sep 2004

“Ua Koe Ke Kuleana O Na Kanaka” (Reserving The Rights Of Native Tenants): Integrating Kuleana Rights And Land Trust Priorities In Hawai`I, Jocelyn B. Garovoy

ExpressO

No abstract provided.


Brown And Tee-Hit-Ton, Earl Maltz Aug 2004

Brown And Tee-Hit-Ton, Earl Maltz

ExpressO

No abstract provided.


Citizens Of An Enemy Land: Enemy Combatants, Aliens, And The Constitutional Rights Of The Pseudo-Citizen, Juliet P. Stumpf Mar 2004

Citizens Of An Enemy Land: Enemy Combatants, Aliens, And The Constitutional Rights Of The Pseudo-Citizen, Juliet P. Stumpf

ExpressO

No abstract provided.


Beyond Reparations: An American Indian Theory Of Justice, William C. Bradford Mar 2004

Beyond Reparations: An American Indian Theory Of Justice, William C. Bradford

ExpressO

The number of states, corporations, and religious groups formally disowning past records of egregious human injustice is mushrooming. Although the Age of Apology is a global phenomenon, the question of reparations—a tort-based mode of redress whereby a wrongdoing group accepts legal responsibility and compensates victims for the damage it inflicted upon them—likely consumes more energy, emotion, and resources in the U.S. than in any other jurisdiction. Since the final year of the Cold War, the U.S. and its political subdivisions have apologized or paid compensation to Japanese-American internees, native Hawaiians, civilians killed in the Korean War, and African American victims …


Justice And The Outsider: Jurisdiction Over Non-Members In Tribal Legal Systems, Bethany R. Berger Feb 2004

Justice And The Outsider: Jurisdiction Over Non-Members In Tribal Legal Systems, Bethany R. Berger

ExpressO

In this Article, I examine and test the assumptions of the United States Supreme Court regarding justice and those considered outsiders to Indian tribes. Over the last quarter century, the Court has progressively limited tribal jurisdiction over both non-Indians and Indians that are not members of the tribe. I examine these decisions to show that they owe less to established doctrine than to two assumptions about jurisdiction over nonmembers. The first is that outsiders will be at a disadvantage and subjected to bias by tribal courts. The second is that jurisdiction over outsiders has little to do with tribal self-government, …