Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
-
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979)) (9)
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979)) (6)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 76-1112, 76-1186 (573 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir. 1978)) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Motion For Leave To File Brief Of Amicus Curiae - Brief Of Amicus Curiae Northwest Steelhead And Salmon Council Of Trout Unlimited
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Petitioner State Of Washington's Brief
Petitioner State Of Washington's Brief
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Motion For Leave To File Brief Amicus Curiae And Brief Amicus Curiae Of Pacific Legal Foundation In Support Of Petitioner State Of Washington, Petitioner Puget Sound Gillnetters Association, And Respondent Washington State Commerical Passenger Fishing Vessel Association
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Supplement To Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Coiurt Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Petitions Puget Sound Gillnetters Association And Purse Seine Vessel Owners Association
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction To Zone Indian Reservations, Robert D. Wilson-Hoss
Jurisdiction To Zone Indian Reservations, Robert D. Wilson-Hoss
Washington Law Review
This comment will examine one of the most critical aspects of the civil jurisdiction issue—tribal jurisdiction to exercise land use planning and zoning control. With such jurisdiction, a tribe may regulate or prohibit the development of reservation lands, and thus exercise a measure of control over the future of its reservation. Without zoning jurisdiction, most tribes would be forced to submit to the judgments of non-Indians about the uses of reservation lands. An introduction to the history and patterns of land ownership on Indian reservations is important to an understanding of the clashes between Indian and non-Indian reservation residents. Equally …
Washington's Public Law 280, Jurisdiction On Indian Reservations, Allan Baris
Washington's Public Law 280, Jurisdiction On Indian Reservations, Allan Baris
Washington Law Review
In April 1977 a Ninth Circuit panel in Yakima I 5 ruled that R.C.W. ch. 37.12 violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. The Supreme Court, in accepting review, has instructed the parties to prepare briefs on both the equal protection challenge and the issue of Washington's compliance with PL-280.17 Several Washington tribes have contended that R.C.W. ch. 37.12 fails to comply with PL-280 because (1) Washington failed to amend its constitution in order to remove a disclaimer of jurisdiction on Indian lands 18 and (2) PL-280 does not permit the assumption of partial jurisdiction by a state. …
Brief In Opposition For Respondent Indian Tribes
Brief In Opposition For Respondent Indian Tribes
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Respondent, Yakima Nation, In Opposition
Brief Of The Respondent, Yakima Nation, In Opposition
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Petitioners, Intervenors
Reply Brief Of Petitioners, Intervenors
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenor Appellant Puget Sound Gillnetters Association In Nos. 77-3654 And 77-3655
Brief Of Intervenor Appellant Puget Sound Gillnetters Association In Nos. 77-3654 And 77-3655
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States And All Intervenor Tribes
Brief For The United States And All Intervenor Tribes
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Tulalip Tribes
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Appellee's Brief
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 76-1112, 76-1186 (573 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir. 1978))
No abstract provided.