Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
-
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985)) (4)
- United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985)) (3)
- Articles (2)
- United States v. Skokomish Indian Tribe, Docket No. 84-3894 (764 F.2d 670 (9th Cir. 1985)) (1)
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief Of Appellant The Suquamish Tribe
Brief Of Appellant The Suquamish Tribe
United States v. Skokomish Indian Tribe, Docket No. 84-3894 (764 F.2d 670 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Opening Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3999 (761 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Joint Amicus Curiae Brief Of Columbia River Tribes
Joint Amicus Curiae Brief Of Columbia River Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellee Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Defendant-Appellants' Reply/Answering Brief
Defendant-Appellants' Reply/Answering Brief
United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Opening Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellee Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States
United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Defendant-Appellants' Consolidated Opening Brief
Defendant-Appellants' Consolidated Opening Brief
United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Opening Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))
No abstract provided.
Sovereign Immunity In Indian Tribal Law, Ralph W. Johnson, James M. Madden
Sovereign Immunity In Indian Tribal Law, Ralph W. Johnson, James M. Madden
Articles
An examination of the tribal courts' civil jurisdiction and sovereign immunity decisions, and a review of the doctrine's origins and purposes in federal and state law reveal the increasing importance of the sovereign immunity doctrine and suggest several options to tribal councils and courts in deciding which aspects of the doctrine to retain. The article concludes that:
(1) The doctrine of sovereign immunity is not part of the con-. trolling federal law applicable to Indian tribal courts, except where trust property is involved.
(2) Each Indian tribe has inherent sovereign power to adopt, reject, or waive the doctrine of sovereign …
Soverign Immunity In Indian Tribal Law, Ralph W. Johnson, James M. Madden
Soverign Immunity In Indian Tribal Law, Ralph W. Johnson, James M. Madden
Articles
An examination of the tribal courts' civil jurisdiction and sovereign immunity decisions, and a review of the doctrine's origins and purposes in federal and state law reveal the increasing importance of the sovereign immunity doctrine and suggest several options to tribal councils and courts in deciding which aspects of the doctrine to retain. The article concludes that:
(1) The doctrine of sovereign immunity is not part of the controlling federal law applicable to Indian tribal courts, except where trust property is involved.
(2) Each Indian tribe has inherent sovereign power to adopt, reject, or waive the doctrine of sovereign immunity …