Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Something Happened: Descent Into The Immigration Maelstrom; Or Fear And Loathing In Fortress America: A Review Of Alien Nation: Common Sense About America 'S Immigration Disaster, By Peter Brimelow; Arguing Immigration: Are New Immigrants A Wealth Of Diversity... Or A Crushing Burden?, By Nicolaus Mills; Legal Immigration: Setting Priorities, By The U.S. Commission On Immigration Reform; And Us. Immigration Policy: Restoring Credibility--Executive Summary, U.S. Commission On Immigration Reform, John Scanlan Oct 1996

Something Happened: Descent Into The Immigration Maelstrom; Or Fear And Loathing In Fortress America: A Review Of Alien Nation: Common Sense About America 'S Immigration Disaster, By Peter Brimelow; Arguing Immigration: Are New Immigrants A Wealth Of Diversity... Or A Crushing Burden?, By Nicolaus Mills; Legal Immigration: Setting Priorities, By The U.S. Commission On Immigration Reform; And Us. Immigration Policy: Restoring Credibility--Executive Summary, U.S. Commission On Immigration Reform, John Scanlan

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies

No abstract provided.


Changing America: Three Arguments About Asian Americans And The Law , Frank H. Wu Feb 1996

Changing America: Three Arguments About Asian Americans And The Law , Frank H. Wu

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.


"One Manner Of Law": The Supreme Court, Stare Decisis And The Immigration Law Plenary Power Doctrine, Anne E. Pettit Jan 1996

"One Manner Of Law": The Supreme Court, Stare Decisis And The Immigration Law Plenary Power Doctrine, Anne E. Pettit

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This note examines the extreme deference the Court gives to Congress in the realm of immigration legislation. The author argues that, in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the Supreme Court's analysis of stare decisis, precedent and the rule of law provides a strikingly effective paradigm through which to view the history of Supreme Court immigration rulings. Viewed through the Court's own analysis of its power to make and revise precedent decisions, the immigration plenary power doctrine's jurisprudential shortcomings become more evident and the arguments to overturn the doctrine become more powerful. This Note concludes that no principled constitutional …