Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Arbitrary (1)
- Arizona v United States (1)
- Arizona v. United States (1)
- Capricious (1)
- Delegation (1)
-
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equitable discretion (1)
- Executive (1)
- Federalism (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Harboring (1)
- Hybrid constitutional claims (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Local (1)
- Mass immigration enforcement (1)
- Padilla v Kentucky (1)
- Padilla v. Kentucky (1)
- Proportionality (1)
- Removal (1)
- Retaliation (1)
- Sanctuary (1)
- Selective enforcement (1)
- State (1)
- U visas (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Review Of Disproportionate (Or Retaliatory) Deportation, Jason A. Cade
Judicial Review Of Disproportionate (Or Retaliatory) Deportation, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
This Article focuses attention on two recent and notable federal court opinions considering challenges to Trump administration deportation decisions. While finding no statutory bar to the noncitizens’ detention and deportation in these cases, the court in each instance paused to highlight the injustice of the removal decisions. This Article places the opinions in the context of emerging immigration enforcement trends, which reflect a growing indifference to disproportionate treatment as well as enforcement actions founded on retaliation for the exercise of constitutional rights. Judicial decisions like the ones considered here serve vital functions in the cause of immigration law reform even …
Sanctuaries As Equitable Delegation In An Era Of Mass Immigration Enforcement, Jason A. Cade
Sanctuaries As Equitable Delegation In An Era Of Mass Immigration Enforcement, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
Opponents of—and sometimes advocates for—sanctuary policies describe them as obstructions to the operation of federal immigration law. This premise is flawed. On the better view, the sanctuary movement comports with, rather than fights against, dominant new themes in federal immigration law. A key theme—emerging both in judicial doctrine and on-the-ground practice—focuses on maintaining legitimacy by fostering adherence to equitable norms in enforcement decision-making processes. Against this backdrop, the sanctuary efforts of cities, churches, and campuses are best seen as measures necessary to inject normative (and sometimes legal) accuracy into real-world immigration enforcement decision-making. Sanctuaries can erect front-line equitable screens, promote …