Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Immigration (3)
- Asylum (2)
- Persecution (2)
- Refugee (2)
- Aliens (1)
-
- Asylum law (1)
- Attack (1)
- Child soldier (1)
- Children of immigrants (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Crime (1)
- Detention of persons (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Emigration (1)
- Exemption (1)
- Federal policy (1)
- Female (1)
- Gender (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Human trafficking (1)
- Illegal immigrants (1)
- Illegal immigration (1)
- Immigration power (1)
- International (1)
- Police power (1)
- Political asylum (1)
- Rape (1)
- Refugee children (1)
- Sexual Assualt (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Children Of A Lesser God: Should The Fourteenth Amendment Be Altered Or Repealed To Deny Automatic Citizenship Rights And Privileges To American Born Children Of Illegal Aliens?, Robert J. Shulman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Testing The Borders: The Boundaries Of State And Local Power To Regulate Illegal Immigration , Brittney M. Lane
Testing The Borders: The Boundaries Of State And Local Power To Regulate Illegal Immigration , Brittney M. Lane
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seeking Asylum For Former Child Soldiers And Victims Of Human Trafficking, Tina Javaherian
Seeking Asylum For Former Child Soldiers And Victims Of Human Trafficking, Tina Javaherian
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An End To The Violence: Justifying Gender As A "Particular Social Group", Suzanne Sidun
An End To The Violence: Justifying Gender As A "Particular Social Group", Suzanne Sidun
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fate Of "Unremovable" Aliens Before And After September 11, 2001: The Supreme Court's Presumptive Six-Month Limit To Post-Removal-Period Detention, Megan Peitzke
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
We Don't Need To See Them Cry: Eliminating The Subjective Apprehension Element Of The Well-Founded Fear Analysis For Child Refugee Applicants, Bridgette A. Carr
We Don't Need To See Them Cry: Eliminating The Subjective Apprehension Element Of The Well-Founded Fear Analysis For Child Refugee Applicants, Bridgette A. Carr
Pepperdine Law Review
This article addresses a barrier to effective protection faced by child refugee applicants. Currently all refugee applicants, including infants, are required to satisfy two elements of well-founded fear. All applicants must prove that they face an objective risk of persecution and that they subjectively fear this risk. But children often cannot exhibit the subject apprehension element of the test. As a result, UNHCR, and the U.S and Canadian governments issued guidelines that encourage decision makers to accept other evidence to prove a child's subjective apprehension when the child is unable to exhibit fear. However, this approach does not go far …