Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Case Colosure (1)
- And Education for Alien Minors Act (1)
- Beltran-Tirado v. INS (1)
- Clear and Convincing Evidence (1)
- DACA (1)
-
- DREAM Act (1)
- Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (1)
- Development (1)
- Existing circuit split (1)
- Federal Circuit courts (1)
- Four-Phase Procedural Framework (1)
- Hyder v. Keisler (1)
- INA financial fraud (1)
- Illegal migration (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration and Naturalization Act (1)
- Improper Deportation (1)
- Lacking statutory definition (1)
- Legal Permanent Residents (1)
- Misuse of a Social Security Number (1)
- Modified Categorical Approach (1)
- Moral Turpitude (1)
- Nijhawan v. Holder (1)
- Relief (1)
- SSN (1)
- Silva-Trevino Doctrine (1)
- Single Nation (1)
- Taylor-Shepard categorical approach (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Achieving The Dream: Extending Immigration Reform To Administrative Case Closure, Tory E. Smith
Achieving The Dream: Extending Immigration Reform To Administrative Case Closure, Tory E. Smith
San Diego Law Review
This Comment compares DACA to administrative case closure and argues that Congress or the President should grant employment authorization to individuals whose cases have been administratively closed. Part I describes the current interpretation of the employment authorization regulation and provides the background of administrative case closure. Part I highlights the disparate treatment that the regulation affords to undocumented immigrants facing deferred action and administrative closure—offering employment authorization to only deferred action recipients. Part II examines the history of deferred action in immigration cases and uses DACA as a framework to show how the scope of the employment authorization regulation should …
Improper Deportation Of Legal Permanent Residents: The U.S. Government’S Mischaracterization Of The Supreme Court’S Decision In Nijhawan V. Holder, Michael R. Devitt
Improper Deportation Of Legal Permanent Residents: The U.S. Government’S Mischaracterization Of The Supreme Court’S Decision In Nijhawan V. Holder, Michael R. Devitt
San Diego International Law Journal
The purpose of this Article is to draw attention to the government’s misinterpretation of the central holding in Nijhawan v. Holder and how it has led to the improper dilution of evidentiary standards in removal proceedings when determining the $10,000 threshold loss requirement under section 101(a)(43)(M)(i) of the INA [hereinafter “M(i)”]. Section II of this article provides a brief doctrinal overview and summary of my proposed procedural methodology; sections III and IV provide essential background information regarding the Supreme Court’s important pre-Nijhawan opinions and the inconsistent methods circuit courts have applied when calculating the monetary threshold under the fraud or …
Naked Dishonesty: Misuse Of A Social Security Number For An Otherwise Legal Purpose May Not Be A Crime Involving Moral Turpitude After All, Nathanael C. Crowley
Naked Dishonesty: Misuse Of A Social Security Number For An Otherwise Legal Purpose May Not Be A Crime Involving Moral Turpitude After All, Nathanael C. Crowley
San Diego International Law Journal
This Comment questions whether the misuse of a Social Security number for an otherwise legal purpose is a crime involving moral turpitude. It begins with a history of moral turpitude and its initial connection to immigration law in the United States. Through a close analysis of misuse of a Social Security number for an otherwise legal purpose as a crime involving moral turpitude in modern cases, this Comment will examine the role of fraud and dishonesty in the question. The analysis reveals a critical distinction between crimes involving dishonesty and crimes involving fraud. This distinction shows that crimes involving naked …