Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Broken promises (1)
- Child (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- DCYF (1)
-
- DHHS (1)
- Deinstitutionalization (1)
- Developmental (1)
- Disabilities (1)
- Disability (1)
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (1)
- Garrity (1)
- Human rights (1)
- IDEA (1)
- IEP (1)
- Institutionalization (1)
- Juvenile (1)
- Law (1)
- New Hampshire (1)
- Nh (1)
- Placement (1)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Residential (1)
- Rights (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- Rsa 171-A (1)
- Special education (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Broken Promises: The Granite State’S Return To The Institutionalization Of Children With Disabilities, Elizabeth Trautz
Broken Promises: The Granite State’S Return To The Institutionalization Of Children With Disabilities, Elizabeth Trautz
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
In 1975, the New Hampshire legislature enacted a progressive statute which mandated the Department of Health and Human Services “to establish, maintain, implement and coordinate a comprehensive service delivery system for developmentally disabled persons.” This law was innovative for its time; it decreed that individual service plans (ISPs) be developed for every client in the state’s service delivery system, guaranteed “a right to adequate and humane habilitation and treatment[,]” and contemplated the state’s area agency system as we know it today. The statute was a steppingstone for the 1981 class action lawsuit of Garrity v. Gallen. This was one of …
Three Observations About Justice Alito's Draft Opinion In Dobbs - Commentary, John M. Greabe
Three Observations About Justice Alito's Draft Opinion In Dobbs - Commentary, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
[Excerpt] "There is much to say about Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which was leaked from the United States Supreme Court on May 2 [2022].
Obviously, the most significant direct consequence of the proposed decision, which overrules Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) while upholding the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that outlaws most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, would be the restriction or elimination of abortion services throughout much of the nation. This will have all sorts of attendant consequences, large and smaller, many of which …