Law Commons^™

Belgian Health Care: A System Worth Studying, Douglas John Maragas

Akron Law Review

This article will focus on basic information pertinent to the Belgian system. A more extensive explanation of the Belgian system, and a proposed American health care plan adapted from the Belgian system, can be found in my report: "A Comprehensive Health Care System Incorporating Public and Private Enterprise: With the Belgian system as a Base, America can Develop a Cost Efficient Comprehensive Health Care System."

Healthcare Reform Symposium September 18, 1992

Akron Law Review

I would like to talk a little bit about what the right questions are when we go about looking at the reform of health care.

Should everyone be guaranteed a health care plan? If you're going to have a universal health care plan, how do you provide universal coverage, how will you expand coverage? How can we pay for it? Who do you think should administer the health care program?

Staffing National Health Care Reform: A Role For Advanced Practice Nurses, Linda H. Aiken, William M. Sage

Akron Law Review

Expanding access and coverage while containing costs can only be accomplished by getting more health care value for our money. Two facts about our current system make this seem possible. First, the currently uninsured are not costless. Providing stop-gap health care to those who lack health insurance is extremely expensive -- people without formal coverage cannot afford preventive services, delay treatment of illness and face substantial barriers to reaching appropriate providers. When they receive care, it is often degrading, usually complicated and costly, and more than occasionally too late. The cost of this "uncompensated" care is borne by all of …

Managed Care Organizations Manage To Escape Liability: Why Issues Of Quantity Vs. Quality Lead To Erisa's Inequitable Preemption Of Claims, Patricia Mullen Ochmann

Akron Law Review

In evaluating patients’ potential legal remedies, this Comment explores 1) the emergence of managed care organizations in the United States; 2) the creation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and how it impacts patients’ claims against their MCOs; 3) the question of “quantity” versus “quality” in evaluating whether ERISA preemption exists; 4) three theories (direct liability, breach of fiduciary duty, and vicarious liability) used to hold MCOs liable for injuries resulting from malpractice or the wrongful denial of benefits; 5) state legislative attempts to circumvent ERISA’s inequitable preemption of claims; and 6) why, given ERISA’s failure …