Law Commons^™

Walking In Their Shoes: Paying Respect To Incompetent Patients, D. Don Welch

Vanderbilt Law Review

One of the great games that judges play is to act as if their decisions are based on objective standards. For understandable reasons,judges prefer that their decrees be seen as resting on accepted principles of law rather than on a judicial choice between two competing,plausible opinions. One such accepted principle has been that decisions giving consent for medical treatment of incompetent patients should be made to serve the "best interests" of the patients.' In recent years,courts increasingly have used a new, seemingly less objective standard called "substituted judgment" to replace the best interests standard in certain situations. Under this new …

Cocaine, Demand, And Addiction: A Study Of The Possible Convergence Of Rational Theory And National Policy, A. Morgan Cloud, Iii

Vanderbilt Law Review

As the "war against drugs" meanders through the century,' policy-makers continue to search for effective strategies for combating the illegal drug industry. For seventy-five years the dominant federal strategy has been to curtail supplies of prohibited substances.' In its many permutations, this supply-side approach has included attempts to eradicate crops, to intercept drugs at the Nation's borders, and to arrest, prosecute, and punish commercial participants at every level of the production and distribution system.

By any rational measure, the supply-side "war against drugs" has failed. Only ten to fifteen percent of the illicit drugs entering the country are intercepted and …