Law Commons^™

Hospital Quality Improvement: Are Peer Review Immunity, Privilege, And Confidentiality In The Public Interest?, Michael D. Benson Md, Jordan B. Benson Cpa, Jd, Mark S. Stein Jd, Phd

Michael D Benson MD

Participants in the hospital peer-review process enjoy enormous protections under federal and state law. We contend that these protections – immunity, evidentiary privilege, and confidentiality – retard quality improvement in health care. As a result of these protections, the current peer-review system produces both improper severity and improper leniency. We propose to reform the system by eliminating all federal and state statutory protections for the peer-review process. A public process that is open to review and open to challenge by all interested parties will better promote health-care quality.