Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Implementing Health Reform At The State Level: Access And Care For Vulnerable Populations, John V. Jacobi, Sidney D. Watson, Robert Restuccia
Implementing Health Reform At The State Level: Access And Care For Vulnerable Populations, John V. Jacobi, Sidney D. Watson, Robert Restuccia
All Faculty Scholarship
The Affordable Care Act1 (ACA) promises to improve access to coverage and care for two vulnerable groups: low-income persons who are excluded by a lack of resources and chronically ill and disabled people who are excluded by the dysfunction of our existing insurance and care delivery systems. ACA’s sprawling provisions raise a wealth of implementation challenges that are exacerbated by the compromises required to move reform through Congress. In particular, the compromise between regulatory/public program advocates and advocates for private, market-driven programs requires thoughtful regulatory coordination between public and private health systems.
The anticipated increase in coverage is roughly …
Regulating To Promote Competition In Designing Health Insurance Exchanges, Thomas L. Greaney
Regulating To Promote Competition In Designing Health Insurance Exchanges, Thomas L. Greaney
All Faculty Scholarship
Many of the most contentious issues in the debate over health reform concerned the performance and competitiveness of private health insurance including abusive and unfair practices such as denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions; the impact of dominant insurers serving individual and small group markets; and purportedly excessive profits of the insurance industry and lavish salaries of their executives. A key component of the Affordable Care Act for implementing and overseeing reforms directed at these problems is the establishment of market-making entities, health insurance exchanges. These state-run entities will certify insurers’ compliance with regulations, monitor their performance, and take …
Racial Inequities In Mortality And Access To Health Care: The Untold Peril Of Rationing Health Care In The United States, Ruqaiijah A. Yearby
Racial Inequities In Mortality And Access To Health Care: The Untold Peril Of Rationing Health Care In The United States, Ruqaiijah A. Yearby
All Faculty Scholarship
On February 25, 2007, a 12-year-old African American boy named Deamonte Driver died of a toothache because he did not receive a routine $80 tooth extraction that may have saved him, which was covered by his insurer: Medicaid. Unable to afford $80 or find a dentist that took Medicaid, Deamonte wound up in the emergency room, underwent two brain surgeries, and was in the hospital for six weeks of treatment, which cost approximately $250,000. In the end, Deamonte still died from a brain infection caused by the spread of the bacteria from the abscess in his mouth.
While Deamonte did …
Shifting The Conversation: Disability, Disparities And Health Care Reform, Elizabeth Pendo
Shifting The Conversation: Disability, Disparities And Health Care Reform, Elizabeth Pendo
All Faculty Scholarship
This piece is an invitation to consider health care reform as a political shift in our thinking about the barriers and inequalities experienced by people with disabilities in our health care system. Traditionally, when these issues have been addressed, the predominant approach has been through a civil rights framework, specifically the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Now, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) offers a new approach. This essay will outline the barriers to health and health care experienced by people with disabilities, drawing upon my ongoing research …
The Affordable Care Act And Competition: Antidote Or Placebo?, Thomas L. Greaney
The Affordable Care Act And Competition: Antidote Or Placebo?, Thomas L. Greaney
All Faculty Scholarship
In the run-up to its enactment, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) elicited howls of protest from opponents who claimed the federal government was, “taking over,” the American healthcare system, “micromanaging,” medicine, and generally exposing the nation to the bête noire of, “socialized medicine.” Hyperbole, misrepresentation and chauvinism aside, these sound bites suffer from a deeper flaw: They mischaracterize the fundamental thrust of the new law. Though the law establishes significant new regulatory authority, this is neither a new development (indeed it can be faulted for preserving pre-existing regulatory regimes) nor does it impair market competition. To the …