Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Breach of Privacy (1)
- Children’s Online Privacy (1)
- Child’s Health (1)
-
- Constitution's Taxing and Spending Clause (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Corporate Diversity (1)
- Corporate Law (1)
- Eminent Domain (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- FDA (1)
- Federal Securities Law (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Internet Property Rights (1)
- Model Toxics Control Act (1)
- Outer Space Arms Race (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Professor David Skover (1)
- Regulation of Social Media (1)
- Regulations on Sunscreen (1)
- Sharenting (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Media Regulation (1)
- Sunscreen (1)
- Sunscreen Regulation (1)
- Takings Clause (1)
- Washington State (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sharenting Is Here To Stay, So Now What?, Anonymous Author
Sharenting Is Here To Stay, So Now What?, Anonymous Author
Seattle University Law Review
This Note explores the concept of sharenting, its real-world consequences, and the daunting task of creating a workable solution. Part I of this Note provides a broad overview of sharenting and its implications. Part II describes the current state of the law and why sharenting remains a difficult issue to address. Part III discusses four legal frameworks posed by legal scholars to combat sharenting: anti-bullying, privacy, erasure, and child labor laws—and, ultimately, why each fails to offer an airtight solution. Part IV offers an alternative solution: the regulation of data brokers and outlawing advertisement-based social media platforms to protect children’s …
A Hot Topic: Is The Fda’S Approach To Sunscreen Regulation Failing Consumers?, Haley Westman
A Hot Topic: Is The Fda’S Approach To Sunscreen Regulation Failing Consumers?, Haley Westman
Seattle University Law Review
This Note suggests a better balance between allowing sunscreen innovation and protecting the public from unsafe products. Part I of this Note will review the factual background of the public’s attention to sunscreen, explain the current sunscreen issues in the news, and highlight the different actors involved in the growing discourse surrounding sunscreen. Part I will also show that the actors involved in the sunscreen industry—scientific researchers, social media influencers, and the public at large—have considerable influence on consumers’ trust in sunscreen, their buying habits, and the FDA’s approach to sunscreen regulation. Part II of this Note will outline the …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
A Cost To Bear—Environmental Contamination And Eminent Domain, Evan C. Heaney
A Cost To Bear—Environmental Contamination And Eminent Domain, Evan C. Heaney
Seattle University Law Review
This Note advocates for Washington courts to adopt a system that universally allows evidence of environmental contamination on the private property taken in eminent domain proceedings. Part I of this Note discusses the history and progression of eminent domain and the broader constitutional roots of the Takings Clause. Part II explores Washington’s environmental remediation statute. Part III details the various approaches jurisdictions around the county have formulated to deal with this issue. Part IV argues Washington courts should adopt the inclusionary approach, which allows the introduction of environmental evidence in eminent domain proceedings.