Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Experimental Medical Treatments: Who Should Decide Coverage?, Jody C. Collins
Experimental Medical Treatments: Who Should Decide Coverage?, Jody C. Collins
Seattle University Law Review
To illustrate the controversy surrounding experimental treatment provisions in general, this Comment examines the case law and resulting legislation pertaining to HDC-ABMT as a treatment for breast cancer. Part I presents background information on autologous bone marrow transplants generally, and how the treatment relates specifically to breast cancer patients. Part II presents a survey of current law regarding coverage of HDC-ABMT for breast cancer. Part III explores the merits and limits of judicial and legislative determinations of whether a particular treatment is covered under an insurance policy. Part III then concludes that while judicial and legislative intervention may be appropriate, …
Who Should Make Medical Decisions For Incompetent Adults? A Critique Of Rcw 7.70.065, Adrienne E. Quinn
Who Should Make Medical Decisions For Incompetent Adults? A Critique Of Rcw 7.70.065, Adrienne E. Quinn
Seattle University Law Review
To show why the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 7.70.065, Washington's medical decision-making statute should be rewritten, this Comment discusses: (1) the importance of autonomy and self-determination in medical decision-making; (2) the purpose of proxy medical decision-making statutes; (3) Washington's proxy *574 decision-making statute; and, (4) current family demographics. This Comment concludes by proposing a new medical decision-making statute for Washington.
Assisted Suicide: The State Versus The People, John P. Safranek, Stephen J. Safranek
Assisted Suicide: The State Versus The People, John P. Safranek, Stephen J. Safranek
Seattle University Law Review
This Article will examine the Ninth Circuit's appeal to personal dignity and autonomy to justify a constitutional right of assisted suicide in the face of pluralist opposition, that is, a law duly enacted by a majority of elected representatives in a state or by the people directly. Scrutiny of the Ninth Circuit's decision will reveal the formidable jurisprudential obstacles to basing a right to assisted suicide on dignity and autonomy, obstacles the Supreme Court refused to overcome in revoking Compassion in Dying. This examination is divided into three parts: the first analyzes attempts to justify rights on the principle …
Every Category Of Provider: Hindsight Is 20/20 Vision, Melanie K. Curtice
Every Category Of Provider: Hindsight Is 20/20 Vision, Melanie K. Curtice
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment contends that if the "Every Category of Provider" statute had been properly limited, as intended and not as interpreted, it would not have met its ultimate fate of ERISA preemption. In order to show how this public interest legislation could remain in effect and provide at least minimal statutory support for consumer choice, an overview of Washington state health care reform, ERISA preemption, and the federal district court decision preempting the statute is necessary. In Part I, this Comment provides a brief history of the "Every Category of Provider" statute and the Bulletin. Part II contains a summary …
Genetic Privacy In Washington State: Policy Considerations And A Model Genetic Privacy Act, Karen Ann Jensen
Genetic Privacy In Washington State: Policy Considerations And A Model Genetic Privacy Act, Karen Ann Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment presents background information concerning genetic information and genetic testing. Section III then argues that privacy and autonomy are significant policy issues in connection with genetic information. As a result, the decision to have genetic testing performed should be an individual's choice, and genetic testing should never be compelled. Section IV argues that the failure to give genetic information special protection in the law has potentially harmful consequences. Section V surveys current efforts to protect genetic privacy, both by the federal government and states other than Washington. Section V also analyzes the current state of medical records privacy protection …