Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Police (3)
- Searches (3)
- Seizures (3)
-
- Admissibility (2)
- Mapp v. Ohio (2)
- Search and Seizure (2)
- Wolf v. Colorado (2)
- Arrest (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Consitutional interpretation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Search and Seizure (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Crime (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Detroit (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Gun control (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Minnesota (1)
- Motor Vehicles (1)
- New York City (1)
- Olmstead v. United States (1)
- Police misconduct (1)
- Privacy (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fourth Amendment Standing And Expectations Of Privacy: Rakas V. Illinois And New Directions For Some Old Concepts, Richard A. Williamson
Fourth Amendment Standing And Expectations Of Privacy: Rakas V. Illinois And New Directions For Some Old Concepts, Richard A. Williamson
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment In Flux: The Rise And Fall Of Probable Cause, Ronald J. Bacigal
The Fourth Amendment In Flux: The Rise And Fall Of Probable Cause, Ronald J. Bacigal
Law Faculty Publications
This article will demonstrate the Supreme Court's inability to develop an objective methodology to derive and apply fourth amendment principles under either the traditional probable cause approach or the balancing approach. A detailed analysis of traditional probable cause will reveal that its premises are ultimately subjectively derived? This examination will also show that returning to traditional probable cause would necessitate resurrecting the unrealistic premise that an individual's privacy interest is always outweighed by the government's interest in searching if the authorities meet a static standard of probable cause. The article will then discuss the advent of the balancing approach and …
The Minimization Requirement In Electronic Surveillance: Title Iii, The Fourth Amendment, And The Dread Scott Decision, Clifford S. Fishman
The Minimization Requirement In Electronic Surveillance: Title Iii, The Fourth Amendment, And The Dread Scott Decision, Clifford S. Fishman
Scholarly Articles
This article addresses the problems raised by the Title III minimization requirement with particular emphasis on the Supreme Court's decision in Scott. Section I outlines the provisions of Title III that govern the issuance of eavesdropping warrants and the use of derivative evidence. Section II discusses the minimization provision and the definitional problems it presents. Section III analyzes judicial treatment of the minimization provision in light of Scott, and factors that have been held to affect a monitoring agent's ability to minimize interceptions. Section IV discusses judicial approaches to minimization litigation with respect to the problems of standing, guidelines for …
The Exclusionary Rule In Historical Perspective: The Struggle To Make The Fourth Amendment More Than 'An Empty Blessing', Yale Kamisar
The Exclusionary Rule In Historical Perspective: The Struggle To Make The Fourth Amendment More Than 'An Empty Blessing', Yale Kamisar
Articles
In the 65 years since the Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule, few critics have attacked it with as much vigor and on as many fronts as did Judge Malcolm Wilkey in his recent Judicature article, "The exclusionary rule: why suppress valid evidence?" (November 1978).
A Defense Of The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
A Defense Of The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Articles
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and with a variety of arguments. Some critics find it unworkable and resort to empirically based arguments. Others see it as the product of a belated and unwarranted judicial interpretation. Still others, uncertain whether the rule works, are confident that in some fashion law enforcement's hands are tied. Professor Yale Kamisar, long a defender of the exclusionary rule, reviews the current attacks on the rule and offers a vigorous rebuttal. He finds it difficult to accept that there is a line for acceptable police conduct …
Exclusionary Rule: Reasonable Remarks On Unreasonable Search And Seizure, Yale Kamisar
Exclusionary Rule: Reasonable Remarks On Unreasonable Search And Seizure, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in criminal trials? Can the Fourth Amendment live without it? A growing number of lawyers and judges, including Chief Justice Warren Burger, have called for abandonment of the rule, usually on the ground that it has not prevented illegal searches and seizures and on the ground that the rule has contributed significantly to the increase in crime. No one has convincingly demonstrated a causal link between the high rate of crime in America and the exclusionary rule, and I do not believe that any …