Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- The University of Akron (26)
- Selected Works (16)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (6)
-
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Hamline University (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (50)
- Privacy (24)
- Fourth amendment (19)
- Search and seizure (17)
- Surveillance (8)
-
- Due process (7)
- Police (7)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Fifth Amendment (6)
- Probable cause (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Fifth amendment (5)
- Katz (5)
- Reasonableness (5)
- Searches (5)
- United States v. Jones (5)
- Unreasonable search and seizure (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Criminal procedure (4)
- Equal protection (4)
- Internet (4)
- Katz v. United States (4)
- New York Constitution Article I Section 12 (4)
- Search (4)
- Section 1983 (4)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (4)
- Warrantless search (4)
- Cybersurveillance (3)
- Publication
-
- Akron Law Review (26)
- Touro Law Review (16)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- Maryland Law Review (5)
-
- Florida Law Review (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Timothy P. O'Neill (3)
- William & Mary Law Review (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Daniel A. Horwitz (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Lori B. Andrews (2)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Stephen E Henderson (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brendan M. Conner (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 145
Full-Text Articles in Law
Submarine Cables, Cybersecurity And International Law: An Intersectional Analysis, Tara Davenport
Submarine Cables, Cybersecurity And International Law: An Intersectional Analysis, Tara Davenport
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Digital Border Searches After Riley V. California, Thomas Mann Miller
Digital Border Searches After Riley V. California, Thomas Mann Miller
Washington Law Review
The federal government claims that the Fourth Amendment permits it to search digital information on cell phones, laptops, and other electronic devices at the international border without suspicion of criminal activity, much less a warrant. Until recently, federal courts have generally permitted these digital border searches, treating them no differently from searches of luggage. Courts that have limited digital border searches have required only that the government establish reasonable suspicion for the most exhaustive kind of digital search. The Supreme Court has not yet weighed in, but last year it held in Riley v. California that the search incident to …
Foreword: Private And Public Revisited Once Again, Mark A. Graber
Foreword: Private And Public Revisited Once Again, Mark A. Graber
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Same-Sex Marriage: Formalism, Realism, And Social Change In Lawrence (2003), Windsor (2013), & Obergefell (2015), Ronald Kahn
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privacy, Police Power, And The Growth Of Public Power In The Early Twentieth Century: A Not So Unlikely Coexistence, Carol Nackenoff
Privacy, Police Power, And The Growth Of Public Power In The Early Twentieth Century: A Not So Unlikely Coexistence, Carol Nackenoff
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Neuro Lie Detection And Mental Privacy, Madison Kilbride, Jason Iuliano
Neuro Lie Detection And Mental Privacy, Madison Kilbride, Jason Iuliano
Maryland Law Review
New technologies inevitably raise novel legal questions. This is particularly true of technologies, such as neuro lie detection, that offer new ways to investigate crime. Recently, a number of scholars have asked whether neuro lie detection testing is constitutional. So far, the debate has focused on the Fifth Amendment—specifically whether evidence gathered through neuro lie detection is constitutionally admissible because it is “physical” in nature or inadmissible because it is “testimonial” in nature. Under current Supreme Court doctrine, this Fifth Amendment debate is intractable. However, the more fundamental question of whether the government can compel individuals to undergo a neuro …
Privacy At 50: The Bedroom, The Courtroom, And The Spaces In Between, Judith A. Baer
Privacy At 50: The Bedroom, The Courtroom, And The Spaces In Between, Judith A. Baer
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Specifically Authorized By Binding Precedent Does Not Mean Suggested By Persuasive Precedent: Applying Good-Faith Exception After Davis V. United States, Zachary C. Bolitho
Specifically Authorized By Binding Precedent Does Not Mean Suggested By Persuasive Precedent: Applying Good-Faith Exception After Davis V. United States, Zachary C. Bolitho
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Linguistic Analysis Of The Meanings Of "Search" In The Fourth Amendment: A Search For Common Sense, Clark D. Cunningham
A Linguistic Analysis Of The Meanings Of "Search" In The Fourth Amendment: A Search For Common Sense, Clark D. Cunningham
Clark D. Cunningham
This article offers a new technique for analyzing and evaluating competing interpretations of a legal text and applies that technique to one of the most debated questions of modern constitutional interpretation: the meaning of "searches" in the first clause of the fourth amendment. This Technique is called the "common sense" approach because it begins with a semantic analysis of the text in terms of the sense that the key words have in everyday speech. Such analysis reveals a complex of interlocked concepts that underlies the ability of speakers to recognize meaningful uses of these words. The common sense approach then …
Blood And Privacy: Towards A "Testing-As-Search" Paradigm Under The Fourth Amendment, Andrei Nedelcu
Blood And Privacy: Towards A "Testing-As-Search" Paradigm Under The Fourth Amendment, Andrei Nedelcu
Seattle University Law Review
A vehicle on a public thoroughfare is observed driving erratically and careening across the roadway. After the vehicle strikes another passenger car and comes to a stop, the responding officer notices in the driver the telltale symptoms of intoxication—bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and a distinct odor of intoxicants. On these facts, a lawfully-procured warrant authorizing the extraction of the driver’s blood is obtained. However, the document fails to circumscribe the manner and variety of testing that may be performed on the sample. Does this lack of particularity render the warrant constitutionally infirm as a mandate for chemical analysis of the …
Fourth Amendment Fiduciaries, Kiel Brennan-Marquez
Fourth Amendment Fiduciaries, Kiel Brennan-Marquez
Fordham Law Review
Fourth Amendment law is sorely in need of reform. To paraphrase Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. Jones, the idea that people have no expectation of privacy in information voluntarily shared with third-parties—the foundation of the widely reviled “third-party doctrine”—makes little sense in the digital age.
In truth, however, it is not just the third-party doctrine that needs retooling today. It is the Fourth Amendment’s general approach to the problem of “shared information.” Under existing law, if A shares information with B, A runs the risk of “misplaced trust”—the risk that B will disclose the information to law …
Government Analysis Of Shed Dna Is A Search Under The Fourth Amendment, Tracey Maclin
Government Analysis Of Shed Dna Is A Search Under The Fourth Amendment, Tracey Maclin
Faculty Scholarship
This article addresses whether the Fourth Amendment is implicated when police surreptitiously collect and analyze a person’s involuntarily shed DNA.
Law enforcement officers will often obtain shed or abandoned DNA samples from persons who they suspect have committed crimes, but lack sufficient evidence to arrest or detain such persons. When utilizing abandoned or shed DNA for criminal investigative purposes, there are two state actions which arguably trigger Fourth Amendment protection. First, the collection of the biological material which contains a person’s DNA might be considered a search under the amendment. Courts, however, have uniformly rejected this argument. For example, when …
Police Encounters With Race And Gender, Eric J. Miller
Police Encounters With Race And Gender, Eric J. Miller
UC Irvine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Third-Party Bathwater: How To Throw Out The Third-Party Doctrine While Preserving Government's Ability To Use Secret Agents, Amy L. Peikoff
Of Third-Party Bathwater: How To Throw Out The Third-Party Doctrine While Preserving Government's Ability To Use Secret Agents, Amy L. Peikoff
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
In Part I of this Article, I discuss the third-party doctrine, including its history, the types of cases to which it has been applied, and arguments in favor of and against it, with particular focus on Orin Kerr's defense of the doctrine. In Part II, I propose an alternative-and, I think, better-way of dealing with cases typically thought to fall under this doctrine. My proposal, as we will see, rests upon the model for the legal protection of privacy that I have elucidated and defended in prior articles: a model based on our rights to property and contract. Finally, …
Regulating Drones Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Marc Jonathan Blitz, James Grimsley, Stephen E. Henderson, Joseph Thai
Regulating Drones Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Marc Jonathan Blitz, James Grimsley, Stephen E. Henderson, Joseph Thai
William & Mary Law Review
The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 requires the Federal Aviation Administration to integrate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, into the national airspace system by September 2015. Yet perhaps because of their chilling accuracy in targeted killings abroad, perhaps because of an increasing consciousness of diminishing privacy more generally, and perhaps simply because of a fear of the unknown, divergent UAV-restrictive legislation has been proposed in Congress and enacted in a number of states. Given UAV utility and cost-effectiveness over a vast range of tasks, however, widespread commercial use ultimately seems certain. Consequently, it is imperative to understand …
Section 1983 Cases In The October 2004 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Section 1983 Cases In The October 2004 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Martin A. Schwartz
No abstract provided.
Dangerous Dicta, David Gray
Dangerous Dicta, David Gray
David C. Gray
In United States v. Heller, the Court held that individuals have a Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms apart from their associations with state militias. Although that holding was and remains controversial, less attention has been paid to what the Heller Court had to say about the Fourth Amendment. Writing for the Court in Heller, Justice Scalia asserts that the phrase “right of the people” in the Fourth Amendment “unambiguously refers to individual rights, not ‘collective’ rights or rights that may only be exercised through participation in some corporate body.” By any definition, this is dicta. It is …
Constitutional Law—Fourth Amendment—State V. Allen: An Effective Alternative To Unconstitutional "Safety Checks" On The State’S Waters, Christian Harrod
Constitutional Law—Fourth Amendment—State V. Allen: An Effective Alternative To Unconstitutional "Safety Checks" On The State’S Waters, Christian Harrod
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulation Or Resistance: A Counter-Narrative Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Alice Ristroph
Regulation Or Resistance: A Counter-Narrative Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Alice Ristroph
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Right To Remain Armed, Jeffrey Bellin
The Right To Remain Armed, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
The laws governing gun possession are changing rapidly. In the past two years, federal courts have wielded a revitalized Second Amendment to invalidate longstanding gun carrying restrictions in Chicago, the District of Columbia, and throughout California. Invoking similar Second Amendment themes, legislators across the country have steadily deregulated public gun carrying, preempting municipal gun control ordinances in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Cleveland.
These changes to substantive gun laws reverberate through the constitutional criminal procedure framework. By making it lawful for citizens to carry guns even in crowded urban areas, enhanced Second Amendment rights trigger Fourth Amendment protections that could …
Drones: Updating The Fourth Amendment And The Technological Trespass Doctrine, S. Alex Spelman
Drones: Updating The Fourth Amendment And The Technological Trespass Doctrine, S. Alex Spelman
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Taxonomy Of The Snowden Disclosures, Margaret Hu
Taxonomy Of The Snowden Disclosures, Margaret Hu
Washington and Lee Law Review
This brief Essay offers a proposed taxonomy of the Snowden Disclosures. An informed discussion on the legality and constitutionality of the emerging cybersurveillance and mass dataveillance programs revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden necessitates the furtherance of cybersurveillance aptitude. This Essay contends, therefore, that a detailed examination of the Snowden disclosures requires not just a careful inquiry into the legal and constitutional framework that guides the oversight of these programs. A close interrogation also requires a careful inquiry into the big data architecture that guides them. This inquiry includes examining the underlying theories of data science and the rationales …
Testimony On Oklahoma Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform, Stephen E. Henderson
Testimony On Oklahoma Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform, Stephen E. Henderson
Stephen E Henderson
Book Review: Psychiatric Justice, Alice M. Batchelder
Book Review: Psychiatric Justice, Alice M. Batchelder
Akron Law Review
In an era in which extensive judicial emphasis has been placed on "due process of law" in criminal proceedings, both in the federal courts and in the state courts, Dr. Szasz's book serves as a jarring reminder that in at least one vital area of the concept of due process, much remains to be done. The emerging definition of due process has enunciated the rights guaranteed the individual by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments; and viewed within that framework, this book, although published in 1965, remains particularly timely, for Szasz, speaking as a psychiatrist, endeavors to demonstrate how …
Warrantless Search Of A College Dormitory, Ronald J. Bacigal
Warrantless Search Of A College Dormitory, Ronald J. Bacigal
Akron Law Review
The first question the courts must consider is whether there are any limitations on when and how university officials may search a dormitory room. Since the fourth amendment has no application to searches and seizures conducted by private individuals, the courts have jurisdiction to review only state action infringing on the constitutional right to a reasonable expectation of privacy. In spite of indirect public financial support and state regulation of private universities, the courts have thus far held that the actions of private university officials are not to be considered as a form of state action. Thus this article is …
The Constitution And Informational Privacy, Or How So-Called Conservatives Countenance Governmental Intrustion Into A Person's Private Affairs, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1985), Michael P. Seng
Michael P. Seng
No abstract provided.
A Legal Note On The Nixon Pardon: Equal Justice Vis-À-Vis Due Process, Luis Kutner
A Legal Note On The Nixon Pardon: Equal Justice Vis-À-Vis Due Process, Luis Kutner
Akron Law Review
THE FIRST TWO MAJOR ACTS of the Ford Presidency-the offer of earned amnesty (at least insofar as draft resisters in the Vietnam conflict are concerned) and the pardon granted to former President Richard M. Nixonwere charitable, wise and just. This article, of course, will discuss the presidential pardon for Mr. Nixon.
When Does Force Become Excessive?, Taryn Prusinski
When Does Force Become Excessive?, Taryn Prusinski
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Inspections: The Loophole In The Fourth Amendment, Ryan Nasim
Administrative Inspections: The Loophole In The Fourth Amendment, Ryan Nasim
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pot In My Backyard: Curtilage Concept Endorsed By The Queens Supreme Court To Suppress Physical Evidence Of Marijuana, Laura J. Mulholland
Pot In My Backyard: Curtilage Concept Endorsed By The Queens Supreme Court To Suppress Physical Evidence Of Marijuana, Laura J. Mulholland
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.