Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tension Between The First And Twenty-First Amendments In State Regulation Of Alcohol Advertising, Brian S. Steffey
Tension Between The First And Twenty-First Amendments In State Regulation Of Alcohol Advertising, Brian S. Steffey
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Recent Development examines the tension between the first and twenty-first amendments when a state uses its twenty-first amendment power to regulate advertisements of alcoholic beverages that qualify for first amendment protection. Part II of this Recent Development explores the Court's standard of review in cases in which the twenty-first amendment impinges upon a fourteenth amendment right. Part II also reviews the scope of constitutional protection that the first amendment accords commercial speech. Part III examines three recent cases in which states have regulated alcohol advertising. Part IV criticizes these decisions for misapplying the appropriate standard and for relying extensively …
Ake V. Oklaboma, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Cleveland Board Of Education V. Loudermill, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Cleveland Board Of Education V. Loudermill, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Black V. Romano, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
The State Action Doctrine In State And Federal Courts, Hala Ayoub
The State Action Doctrine In State And Federal Courts, Hala Ayoub
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Back To The Laboratory With Peremptory Challenges: A Florida Response, James R. Jorgenson
Back To The Laboratory With Peremptory Challenges: A Florida Response, James R. Jorgenson
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Parameters Of Constitutional Reconstruction: Slaughter-House, Cruikshank, And The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert C. Palmer
The Parameters Of Constitutional Reconstruction: Slaughter-House, Cruikshank, And The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert C. Palmer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Desegregating The University Of Florida Law School: Virgil Hawkins V. The Florida Board Of Control, Darryl Paulson, Paul Hawkes
Desegregating The University Of Florida Law School: Virgil Hawkins V. The Florida Board Of Control, Darryl Paulson, Paul Hawkes
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Diverting The Course Of Colorado River: A Reconciliation Of Seventh Circuit Adaptations, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 49 (1984), Michael W. Pinsof, Richard A. Wolfe
Diverting The Course Of Colorado River: A Reconciliation Of Seventh Circuit Adaptations, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 49 (1984), Michael W. Pinsof, Richard A. Wolfe
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Illinois V. Gates: Probable Cause Redefined, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 335 (1984), James W. Reilley, Barry E. Witlin, Christine P. Curran
Illinois V. Gates: Probable Cause Redefined, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 335 (1984), James W. Reilley, Barry E. Witlin, Christine P. Curran
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Ratification Of The Fourteenth Amendment In North Carolina, James E. Bond
Ratification Of The Fourteenth Amendment In North Carolina, James E. Bond
Faculty Articles
The present article focuses on the ratification debate in North Carolina. That debate is instructive for several reasons. In the first place, the legislature considered the amendment on two separate occasions. In December 1866, the legislature overwhelmingly rejected it. Little more than eighteen months later, a new legislature overwhelmingly endorsed it. Second, North Carolinians fought several political battles between 1866 and 1868, and in those battles they often debated the meaning of the fourteenth amendment. Third, North Carolinians adopted a new constitution in 1868 and thereafter enacted reform legislation, much of which reflected their understanding of the concepts embodied in …
New Hearsay Exceptions For A Child's Statement Of Sexual Abuse, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1984), Glen Skoler
New Hearsay Exceptions For A Child's Statement Of Sexual Abuse, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1984), Glen Skoler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substantive Due Process And The Scope Of Constitutional Torts, Michael L. Wells, Thomas A. Eaton
Substantive Due Process And The Scope Of Constitutional Torts, Michael L. Wells, Thomas A. Eaton
Scholarly Works
The thesis of this Article is that both the Supreme Court and its critics have failed to identify and confront the central issue presented by these due process constitutional tort cases. That issue is neither procedural fairness nor the choice between state and federal courts. It is deciding whether a government-inflicted injury to life, liberty, or property violates the substantive protections of the due process clauses and thereby warrants a constitutionally derived tort remedy. In Part II of this Article we examine the Supreme Court's decisions in this area, focusing primarily on Parratt v. Taylor. We demonstrate that neither Parratt …