Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Contraception Mandate Accomodated: Why The Rfra Claim In Zubik V. Burwell Fails, Caroline Mala Corbin
The Contraception Mandate Accomodated: Why The Rfra Claim In Zubik V. Burwell Fails, Caroline Mala Corbin
Short Works
No abstract provided.
Deference To Claims Of Substantial Religious Burden, Caroline Mala Corbin
Deference To Claims Of Substantial Religious Burden, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
No abstract provided.
Corporate Religious Liberty: Why Corporations Are Not Entitled To Religious Exemptions, Caroline Mala Corbin
Corporate Religious Liberty: Why Corporations Are Not Entitled To Religious Exemptions, Caroline Mala Corbin
Short Works
No abstract provided.
The Contraception Mandate, Caroline Mala Corbin
The Contraception Mandate, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
Under the new health care regime, health insurance plans must cover contraception. While religious employers are exempt from this requirement, religiously affiliated employers are not. Several have sued, claiming that the "contraception mandate" violates the Free Exercise Clause, the Free Speech Clause, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. This Essay explains why the contraception mandate violates none of them.
Debate: The Contraception Mandate And Religious Freedom, Steven D. Smith, Caroline Mala Corbin
Debate: The Contraception Mandate And Religious Freedom, Steven D. Smith, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Association After Roberts V. United States Jaycees, Douglas O. Linder
Freedom Of Association After Roberts V. United States Jaycees, Douglas O. Linder
Michigan Law Review
The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Roberts v. United States Jaycees, upholding a Minnesota ruling which requires the Minnesota Jaycees to admit women as full members, ended one controversy but marked only the beginning of a far larger one. It was predicted by many that U.S. Jaycees would answer the question of whether private associations with restrictive membership policies were vulnerable to state anti-discrimination laws or were constitutionally protected. It did not. Instead, while rejecting the Jaycees' constitutional claims, the Court established a comprehensive framework for analyzing future claims of associational freedom that contains a number of …