Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Courts (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Advertising (1)
- Affidavits (1)
-
- And the “Best Test” for Right of Publicity Issues (1)
- Anti-censorship (1)
- Appropriation (1)
- Artistic and literary features (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Ban (1)
- Banned (1)
- Big tech (1)
- Breitbart (1)
- CDA (1)
- Cable (1)
- Cable television (1)
- Capitol riots (1)
- Case law (1)
- Censoring (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Cheatham v. Paisano Publications (1)
- Child pornography (1)
- Chill (1)
- Chilled speech (1)
- Chilling effect (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Civil liberties (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Clarence thomas (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Debunking “De Minimis” Violations Of Prisoners’ Religious Rights: Further Problems With The Supreme Court’S “Hands Off” Approach, Samantha Sparacino
Debunking “De Minimis” Violations Of Prisoners’ Religious Rights: Further Problems With The Supreme Court’S “Hands Off” Approach, Samantha Sparacino
Touro Law Review
Circuits are split as there continues to be an inconsistent application of Supreme Court doctrine stemming from the notion of the separation of church and the state. Imprisonment does not strip a wrongdoer of his constitutionally guaranteed rights and protections. Some Circuits have held that a minor, or de minimis, interpretation of an inmate’s religious rights can constitute a substantial burden under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. In the absence of clear direction from the Supreme Court, I propose that courts should refrain from determining the value of a religious belief or practice as it relates …
Comic Books, The First Amendment, And The “Best Test” For Right Of Publicity Issues, Rachel Silverstein
Comic Books, The First Amendment, And The “Best Test” For Right Of Publicity Issues, Rachel Silverstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deplatformed: Social Network Censorship, The First Amendment, And The Argument To Amend Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act, John A. Lonigro
Deplatformed: Social Network Censorship, The First Amendment, And The Argument To Amend Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act, John A. Lonigro
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Slapps Across America, Jack Toscano
Slapps Across America, Jack Toscano
Touro Law Review
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v. Sullivan was meant to protect our fundamental right to free speech from defamation lawsuits. However, Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, known as SLAPPS, continue to chill free speech through weak but expensive to defend defamation lawsuits. In response to SLAPPs many states have passed anti-SLAPP statutes that are meant to identify SLAPPs, quickly dismiss SLAPPS, and punish plaintiffs who bring SLAPPs. A difficult issue for federal courts throughout the country is whether these state anti-SLAPP statutes should apply in federal courts. This Note examines the Supreme Court opinions in Shady …