Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (3)
- Freedom of the Press (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Journalism (2)
-
- Press Clause (2)
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1)
- Blogs (1)
- Campaign Finance (1)
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Communication technologies (1)
- Congress (1)
- Corporate Political Spending (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Free press (1)
- Internet (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Media (1)
- Media Corporations (1)
- Press (1)
- Printing press (1)
- Public Employees (1)
- Publishing (1)
- Rst Amendment (1)
- Social media (1)
- Speech Clause (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Media Exemption Puzzle Of Campaign Finance Laws, Sonja R. West
The Media Exemption Puzzle Of Campaign Finance Laws, Sonja R. West
Scholarly Works
In the 2010 case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the United States Supreme Court solidified the media exemption dilemma in campaign finance law. When attempting to address concerns about corporate campaign expenditures (i.e., corporate political speech), legislatures are now stuck between a rock and a hard place. Regulate media corporations, and they violate press freedoms. Exempt media corporations from the regulations, however, and they are accused of speaker discrimination.
Thus the question of how to treat the press in campaign finance law can no longer be ignored. Can legislatures, without running afoul of the First Amendment, ever regulate …
The 'Press,' Then & Now, Sonja R. West
The 'Press,' Then & Now, Sonja R. West
Scholarly Works
Does the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of “the press” simply mean that we all have the right to use mass communication technology to disseminate our speech? Or does it provide constitutional safeguards for a particular group of speakers who function as government watchdogs and citizen surrogates? This question defines the current debate over the Press Clause. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, along with recent work by Michael McConnell and Eugene Volokh, suggests the answer is the former. This article pushes back on that view.
It starts by expanding the scope of the relevant historical evidence. Discussions about the …
The Problem With Free Press Absolutism, Sonja R. West
The Problem With Free Press Absolutism, Sonja R. West
Scholarly Works
In her important new book, The First Amendment Bubble, Professor Amy Gajda exposes the many dangers of this all-encompassing attitude about constitutional rights for the press. Sure, there may have been a time when the news media could demand- and the courts and public would grant near immunity for their work, making free press absolutism relatively costless. Yet Gajda provides example after example demonstrating that the courts no longer give the media a free pass. And as the public and the courts' opinions about the press change, Gajda warns, the news media's thinking about their legal protections must change as …
What Did The Supreme Court Hold In Heffernan V. City Of Paterson?, Michael Wells
What Did The Supreme Court Hold In Heffernan V. City Of Paterson?, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
As a favor to his mother, Jeffrey Heffernan picked up a political yard sign. His supervisors demoted him, in the mistaken belief that he had engaged in protected speech. In Heffernan v. City of Patterson, 136 S.Ct. 1412 (2016), the Supreme Court held that a public employee can sue a local government under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when a supervisor acts for constitutionally impermissible motives, even though he has not in fact exercised First Amendment rights. But the grounds for that holding are unclear. The Court may have ruled that the city, through its police chief, violated Heffernan’s First Amendment …