Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Agribusiness (1)
- Anti-SLAPP (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Critical speech (1)
- Dignity (1)
-
- Diversity (1)
- Endorsement (1)
- FDA (1)
- FSMA (1)
- Federal price subsidies (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Food Safety Modernization Act (1)
- Food choice (1)
- Fundamental right (1)
- Liberty of palate (1)
- Marketplace of ideas (1)
- Produce Rule (1)
- Public figure (1)
- Public health (1)
- School speech (1)
- Soda tax (1)
- Speaker identity (1)
- Tester-Hagan (1)
- USDA (1)
- Video games (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
A New Test To Reconcile The Right Of Publicity With Core First Amendment Values, Nat Stern, Mark Joseph Stern
A New Test To Reconcile The Right Of Publicity With Core First Amendment Values, Nat Stern, Mark Joseph Stern
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Dangerous Right To Food Choice, Samuel R. Wiseman
The Dangerous Right To Food Choice, Samuel R. Wiseman
Scholarly Publications
Scholars, advocates, and interest groups have grown increasingly concerned with the ways in which government regulations—from agricultural subsidies to food safety regulations to licensing restrictions on food trucks—affect access to local food. One argument emerging from the interest in recent years is that choosing what foods to eat, what I have previously called “liberty of palate,” is a fundamental right.1 The attraction is obvious: infringements of fundamental rights trigger strict scrutiny, which few statutes survive. As argued elsewhere, the doctrinal case for the existence of such a right is very weak. This Essay does not revisit those arguments, but instead …
Speaker Discrimination: The Next Frontier Of Free Speech, Michael Kagan
Speaker Discrimination: The Next Frontier Of Free Speech, Michael Kagan
Florida State University Law Review
Citizens United v. FEC articulated a pillar of free speech doctrine that is independent from the well-known controversies about corporate personhood and the role of money in elections. For the first time, the Supreme Court clearly said that discrimination on the basis of the identity of the speaker offends the First Amendment. Previously, the focus of free speech doctrine had been on the content and forum of speech, not on the identity of the speaker. It is possible that protection from speaker identity discrimination had long been implicit in free speech case law, but has now been given more full-throated …