Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Content-based discrimination (1)
- David Rosenberg (1)
- Employment Division v. Smith (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
-
- Establishment clause (1)
- Free exercise (1)
- Free exercise clause (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Holocaust denial (1)
- Hudnut (1)
- Judicial decision making (1)
- Kathleen Brady (1)
- Locke v. Davey (1)
- Perry Dane (1)
- Regulation of hate speech (1)
- Religious equality (1)
- Religious freedom (1)
- Religious liberty (1)
- Religious-group autonomy (1)
- Tom Paulin (1)
- Viewpoint-based discrimination (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Pluralistic Foundations Of The Religion Clauses, Steven H. Shiffrin
The Pluralistic Foundations Of The Religion Clauses, Steven H. Shiffrin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Contemporary Supreme Court interpretations suggest that the religion clauses are primarily rooted in the value of equality. The United States Supreme Court has argued that in the absence of discrimination against religion (or the presence of other constitutional values), there is no violation of the Free Exercise Clause when a statute inadvertently burdens religion. Similarly, equality values have played a strong role in the Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudence. Many distinguished commentators have pointed to the equality focus and have argued that it gives insufficient attention to the value of religious liberty. Professor Shiffrin argues that these commentators are right in …
A Moderate Defense Of Hate Speech Regulations On University Campuses, W. Bradley Wendel
A Moderate Defense Of Hate Speech Regulations On University Campuses, W. Bradley Wendel
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The regulation of hate speech on public and private university campuses is a fiercely contested and divisive issue. Professor Bradley Wendel defends the middle ground in this debate. This Essay argues that concerns about abuses of power by those in positions of authority are unfounded when an institution possesses greater expertise in a domain than the citizens who are affected by the institution’s decision, provided that the institution is acting on the basis of reasons that are shared by the affected individual.
Davey And The Limits Of Equality, Laura S. Underkuffler
Davey And The Limits Of Equality, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Thoughts On Smith And Religious-Group Autonomy, Laura S. Underkuffler
Thoughts On Smith And Religious-Group Autonomy, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Searching For The Soul Of Judicial Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study Of Religious Freedom Decisions, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise, Andrew P. Morriss
Searching For The Soul Of Judicial Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study Of Religious Freedom Decisions, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise, Andrew P. Morriss
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
During the past half century, constitutional theories of religious freedom have been in a state of great controversy, perpetual transformation, and consequent uncertainty. Given the vitality of religious faith for most Americans and the vigor of the enduring debate on the proper role of religious belief and practice in public society, a searching exploration of the influences upon judges in making decisions that uphold or reject claims implicating religious freedom is long overdue. Many thoughtful contributions have been to the debate about whether judges should allow their religious beliefs to surface in the exercise of their judicial role. Yet much …