Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, People V. Bull, Randi Schwartz
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, People V. Bull, Randi Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
City Court, City Of Rochester, People V. Griswold, James Dougherty
City Court, City Of Rochester, People V. Griswold, James Dougherty
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Sullivan County, Holman V. Goord, Eric Pack
Supreme Court, Sullivan County, Holman V. Goord, Eric Pack
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, Renco Group, Inc. V. Workers World Party, Inc., Edward Puerta
Supreme Court, New York County, Renco Group, Inc. V. Workers World Party, Inc., Edward Puerta
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Globally Speaking—Honoring The Victims' Stories: Matsuda's Human Rights Praxis, Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol
Globally Speaking—Honoring The Victims' Stories: Matsuda's Human Rights Praxis, Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
Globally speaking, international law and the vast majority of domestic legal systems strive to protect the right to freedom of expression. The United States' First Amendment provides an early historical protection of speech-a safeguard now embraced around the world. The extent of this protection, however, varies among states. The United States stands alone in excluding countervailing considerations of equality, dignitary, or privacy interests that would favor restrictions on speech. The gravamen of the argument supporting such American exceptionalism is that free expression is necessary in a democracy. Totalitarianism, the libertarian narrative goes, thrives on government control of information to the …
Fumbling The First Amendment: The Right Of Publicity Goes 2-0 Against Freedom Of Expression, Thomas E. Kadri
Fumbling The First Amendment: The Right Of Publicity Goes 2-0 Against Freedom Of Expression, Thomas E. Kadri
Michigan Law Review
Two circuits in one summer found in favor of college athletes in right-of-publicity suits filed against the makers of the NCAA Football videogame. Both panels split 2–1; both applied the transformative use test; both dissenters predicted chilling consequences. By insisting that the likeness of each player be “transformed,” the Third and Ninth Circuits employed a test that imperils the use of realistic depictions of public figures in expressive works. This standard could have frosty implications for artists in a range of media: docudramas, biographies, and works of historical fiction may be at risk. This Comment examines the tension between the …