Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Freedom of speech (3)
- Government employees (2)
- Religion (2)
- Advertising (1)
- Antimedia sentiment (1)
-
- Antimedia violence (1)
- Billionaires (1)
- Campus speech codes (1)
- Democratic crisis (1)
- Discriminatory speech (1)
- Doe v. University of Michigan (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- First amendment theory (1)
- Freedom of the press (1)
- Journalism (1)
- Lane v. Franks (1)
- Mass media censorship (1)
- Mass media industry (1)
- Newseum Institute (1)
- Public employee speech (1)
- Public sentiment (1)
- Race-based harassment (1)
- Racial hate speech (1)
- Right to petition (1)
- State of the First Amendment report (1)
- Technology (1)
- Third party litigation funding (1)
- Trump (Donald) (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
First Amendment Right To A Remedy, Benjamin Plener Cover
First Amendment Right To A Remedy, Benjamin Plener Cover
Articles
Scholars and jurists agree that the First Amendment right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” includes a right of court access, but narrowly define this right as the right to file a lawsuit. This dominant view fails to meaningfully differentiate between the right to petition, the freedom of speech, and due process, missing the distinct significance of the Petition Clause when individuals petition courts. The most significant threats to court access today occur after the filing stage, when courts deny or limit remedies to legally injured persons — by enforcing a mandatory arbitration provision or an exhaustion …
Public Employee Speech: Answering The Unanswered And Related Questions In Lane V. Franks, John E. Rumel
Public Employee Speech: Answering The Unanswered And Related Questions In Lane V. Franks, John E. Rumel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Bankrupt Marketplace: First Amendment Theory And The 2016 Presidential Election, Leonard M. Niehoff
Bankrupt Marketplace: First Amendment Theory And The 2016 Presidential Election, Leonard M. Niehoff
Articles
In this article I advance two arguments. The first is that 2016 was a particularly important year for freedom of speech and the press, although not for conventional reasons. The second is that hte events of 2016 revealed that one of the essential components of our democracy - the central role that free expression plays in the democratic process - is in a state of serious dysfunction, if not crisis.
Are Trump's Attacks On The Media Adversely Affecting Public Opinion?, Leonard M. Niehoff
Are Trump's Attacks On The Media Adversely Affecting Public Opinion?, Leonard M. Niehoff
Articles
Both during the election cycle and as president of the United States, Donald Trump has enthusiastically and aggressively attacked the media. On Twitter, in speeches, and at rallies he has repeatedly deployed his favorite “f words” against mainstream broadcast, print, and online news sources: “fake,” “fraudulent,” “failing,” and (phonetically) “phony.” Some attacks have been personal to individual journalists, some have been more institutionally focused, and some have been made in contexts that appeared to create physical risk to reporters who were present. But whatever the variation in lavors, the frequency of the attacks has remained constant. Indeed, Trump has devoted …
Doe V. University Of Michigan: Free Speech On Campus 25 Years Later, Leonard M. Niehoff
Doe V. University Of Michigan: Free Speech On Campus 25 Years Later, Leonard M. Niehoff
Articles
I would like to use as the launching pad for my remarks today the 1989 federal district court decision in Doe v. University of Michigan. Doe is the seminal case on campus speech codes and it just recently passed its twenty-fifth anniversary. I thought this symposium would be a good occasion to look back, see where we were, assess where we are, and ask whether we have made any progress. Spoiler alert: the news is not good.
Ending The Pursuit: Releasing Attorney Advertising Regulations At The Intersection Of Technology And The First Amendment, Jan L. Jacobowitz
Ending The Pursuit: Releasing Attorney Advertising Regulations At The Intersection Of Technology And The First Amendment, Jan L. Jacobowitz
Articles
No abstract provided.
A Free Speech Tale Of Two County Clerk Refusals, Caroline Mala Corbin
A Free Speech Tale Of Two County Clerk Refusals, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
The ever-expanding Free Speech Clause has made possible claims that would have been unthinkable until recently. This symposium Essay examines the compelled speech claims of two hypothetical county clerks who believe that marriage should be limited to unions between one man and one woman, and who argue that forcing them to issue marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples compels them to speak in favor of same-sex marriage in violation of the Free Speech Clause.
When a government employee such as a county clerk speaks, she may not be speaking as just a private individual. She may also be speaking …
Government Employee Religion, Caroline Mala Corbin
Government Employee Religion, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
Picture a county clerk who refuses to issue a marriage license to an LGBT couple or a city bus driver who insists on wearing a hijab. The clerk is fired for failing to fulfill job responsibilities and the bus driver for violating official dress codes. Both claim that their termination violates the First Amendment speech and religion clauses.
There is a well-developed First Amendment government employee speech jurisprudence. Less developed is the doctrine and literature for First Amendment government employee religion. The existing Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence usually does not specifically account for the government employee context. This Article attempts …
The Weaponized Lawsuit Against The Media: Litigation Funding As A New Threat To Journalism, Lili Levi
The Weaponized Lawsuit Against The Media: Litigation Funding As A New Threat To Journalism, Lili Levi
Articles
This Article identifies a new front in the current war against the media one in which billionaire private actors clandestinely fund other people's lawsuits in an attempt to censor press entities. The use of strategic litigation to shutter media outlets constitutes a major threat to the expressive order. And the current climate of press failures, institutional disaggregation, decreasing accountability journalism, and declining public trust-the very vulnerability of the press today-significantly amplifies the chilling impact of strategic third party funding. It does so whether the strategy is death-by-a-thousand litigations or titanic, bankruptcy-inducing damage verdicts.
Still, contrary to the assertions of both …