Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Branzburg v. hayes (1)
- Classficiation and rating administration (1)
- Communications decency act of 1996 (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
-
- Defamation (1)
- Distributor liability (1)
- Espionage Act (1)
- First amendment (1)
- ISP (1)
- Internet service providers (1)
- Journalists (1)
- Libel and slander (1)
- MPAA (1)
- Monopolies (1)
- Morality (1)
- Motion picture and video distribution (1)
- Motion picture association of america (1)
- Motion picture industry (1)
- National security (1)
- Privileges and immunities (1)
- Production (1)
- Reporer's privilege (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Trade regulation (1)
- War on leaks (1)
- Whistleblowing (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Aiding The Enemy Or Promoting Democracy? Defining The Rights Of Journalists And Whistleblowers To Disclose National Security Information, Candice M. Kines
Aiding The Enemy Or Promoting Democracy? Defining The Rights Of Journalists And Whistleblowers To Disclose National Security Information, Candice M. Kines
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Mpaa: A Script For An Antitrust Production, Ian G. Henry
The Mpaa: A Script For An Antitrust Production, Ian G. Henry
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Re-Establishing Distributor Liability On The Internet: Recognizing The Applicability Of Traditional Defamation Law To Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act Of 1996, William E. Buelow Iii
Re-Establishing Distributor Liability On The Internet: Recognizing The Applicability Of Traditional Defamation Law To Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act Of 1996, William E. Buelow Iii
West Virginia Law Review
Plaintiffs whose reputations have suffered irreparable injury from the distribution of defamatory statements have generally been permitted by law to recover damages from the enterprises that distributed the publications known to contain the defamatory material. However, when the enterprise that knowingly distributed the injurious content is an Internet service provider ("ISP"), present law denies that same plaintiff recovery. This perception of ISP immunity flows from a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Zeran v. America Online, Inc., where the Court extended certain immunities offered by the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (the "CDA"). …