Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Family Law

2016

Parent and Child

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Biology, Genetics, Nurture, And The Law: The Expansion Of The Legal Definition Of Family To Include Three Or More Legal Parents, Myrisha S. Lewis Apr 2016

Biology, Genetics, Nurture, And The Law: The Expansion Of The Legal Definition Of Family To Include Three Or More Legal Parents, Myrisha S. Lewis

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Why The American Child Welfare System Is Not Child Centered, Richard J. Gelles Mar 2016

Why The American Child Welfare System Is Not Child Centered, Richard J. Gelles

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Impact Of Liberal Ideology On Child Protection Reform, Cassie Statuto Bevan Mar 2016

The Impact Of Liberal Ideology On Child Protection Reform, Cassie Statuto Bevan

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Diagnosing Liberal Resistance To Needed Child Welfare Reforms, James G. Dwyer Mar 2016

Diagnosing Liberal Resistance To Needed Child Welfare Reforms, James G. Dwyer

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Thoughts On The Liberal Dilemma In Child Welfare Reform, Elizabeth Bartholet Mar 2016

Thoughts On The Liberal Dilemma In Child Welfare Reform, Elizabeth Bartholet

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Child Protection’S Parental Preference, Daniel Heimpel Mar 2016

Child Protection’S Parental Preference, Daniel Heimpel

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Stanley V. Illinois’S Untold Story, Josh Gupta-Kagan Mar 2016

Stanley V. Illinois’S Untold Story, Josh Gupta-Kagan

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Stanley v. Illinois is one of the Supreme Court’s more curious landmark cases. The holding is well known: the Due Process Clause both prohibits states from removing children from the care of unwed fathers simply because they are not married and requires states to provide all parents with a hearing on their fitness. By recognizing strong due process protections for parents’ rights, Stanley reaffirmed Lochner-era cases that had been in doubt and formed the foundation of modern constitutional family law. But Peter Stanley never raised due process arguments, so it has long been unclear how the Court reached this decision. …

Go to article