Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Estates and Trusts

Michigan Law Review

1946

Intent

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Wills--Specific Bequest Of Capital Stock--Disposition Of Stock Dividends Declared Before Testator's Death, E. M. Deal Dec 1946

Wills--Specific Bequest Of Capital Stock--Disposition Of Stock Dividends Declared Before Testator's Death, E. M. Deal

Michigan Law Review

In her will, testatrix made several specific gifts to Miss Dorothy Spencer, including "20 shares of stock of the Times-Picayune Publishing Company," the extent of her holding at the time the will was executed. Later, the company declared a 100 per cent stock dividend and issued testatrix a certificate for an additional 20 shares. When she died, testatrix had in her possession certificates for 40 shares of the corporation's stock. Ten legatees objected to a provisional account filed by her executor which listed the 40 shares as belonging to Dorothy Spencer, claiming that the additional shares should be converted into …


Wills-Pretermitted Heir Statute-Incorporation By Reference, Shubrick T. Kothe Dec 1946

Wills-Pretermitted Heir Statute-Incorporation By Reference, Shubrick T. Kothe

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, adopted daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Burdick, deceased, left them some years before their deaths. Mr. Burdick provided in his will that plaintiff was to get two legacies, and Mrs. Burdick, who died after her husband, did not specifically mention plaintiff, but provided that the residue of her estate should be distributed as provided in her husband's will. She subsequently revoked this provision by a codicil which gave the residue to one Langley. Plaintiff claimed a share of the estate under the Arkansas "pretermitted child" statute. Held, Mrs. Burdick's reference to her husband's will incorporated it into her …


Future Interests--Effect On Contingent Remainders Of Widow-Life Tenant's Election To Take Against A Will, Niel Mckay S.Ed. Dec 1946

Future Interests--Effect On Contingent Remainders Of Widow-Life Tenant's Election To Take Against A Will, Niel Mckay S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Testator devised one half of the income from an undivided one-third interest in certain real estate to the defendant, his wife, and provided that on her death the undivided one-third interest was to go to his brother and sister, plaintiffs here, if living, otherwise to his children in a certain named order if living. The defendant, testator's widow, elected to take her statutory share against the will, and the county court decreed her a one-half interest in the undivided one third, the other one-half interest going to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs, also having title to the other two thirds of the …


Co-Tenancy-Conveyance By Grantor To Himself And Another, Shubrick T. Kothe Jun 1946

Co-Tenancy-Conveyance By Grantor To Himself And Another, Shubrick T. Kothe

Michigan Law Review

Decedent, owning land and personal property thereon, executed a deed purporting to convey to herself and her son a life estate in the property "as joint tenants during their joint lives and an absolute fee forever in the remainder to the survivor of them. . . " Held, the deed created a tenancy in common in both of them during their lives and an estate in fee to the survivor. Hass v. Hass, (Wis. 1946) 21 N.W. (2d) 398.


Charities-Words Necessary To Create A Valid Trust For Charitable Purposes, John S. Dobson S.Ed. Apr 1946

Charities-Words Necessary To Create A Valid Trust For Charitable Purposes, John S. Dobson S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Testatrix left a will in which she directed her executor, after paying certain specific bequests, to give the residue of her estate "to some worthy cause or institution." From a decree rejecting the contention of decedent's next of kin that this residuary gift was void for indefiniteness, the next of kin appeal, arguing that the word "worthy" is not synonymous with "charitable," and that, in view of this, the bequest should fail for uncertainty, because testatrix did not specify the particular institution which was to receive the benefit of her bounty. Held, the bequest is valid. This court feels …