Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Estates and Trusts

Michigan Law Review

1939

Intent

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Appeal And Error - The Administrator As A Party Aggrieved By Probate Of Will, John H. Uhl Mar 1939

Appeal And Error - The Administrator As A Party Aggrieved By Probate Of Will, John H. Uhl

Michigan Law Review

In an action to prove the existence of a lost will executed by the deceased, judgment was rendered setting up the lost will and revoking the letters of administration which had been issued. The administrator appealed from this order, and the appellee moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the administrator had no such interest as entitled him to review. The governing statute permitted appeal by "any party aggrieved by any final order, judgment, or decree." Held, that the administrator who has qualified as such was entitled to appeal under the statute, as the party aggrieved by …


Wills - Construction - Meaning Of "Issue" In Testamentary Gifts, Daniel Hodgman Feb 1939

Wills - Construction - Meaning Of "Issue" In Testamentary Gifts, Daniel Hodgman

Michigan Law Review

Two recent cases illustrate a trend in the judicial construction of the word "issue" in wills which seems to be divergent from the view expressed in the older cases.

In Re Thompson's Estate there was a bequest to A and B for their lives and at the death of the survivor "one half thereof to the living issue of each daughter, if there then be such issue of each, whether of the first or succeeding generations." At the death of the survivor there were six children of A and two grandchildren, issue of living children, and there were two children …


Banks And Banking - Trusts - Special Deposits - Agreement Between Depositor And Bank, Robert E. Sipes Jan 1939

Banks And Banking - Trusts - Special Deposits - Agreement Between Depositor And Bank, Robert E. Sipes

Michigan Law Review

During a period of widespread bank failures, plaintiff corporation ceased depositing its funds with the defendant bank. To maintain the public's impression that the plaintiff was a regular customer of the bank, an agreement was entered into by the bank and the plaintiff whereby the bank was appointed "agent" of the plaintiff to collect and remit promptly money due plaintiff. Branch offices of the plaintiff deposited money under this agreement to be transmitted to the plaintiff. When the bank failed with some of this money still in its hands, plaintiff sought to be allowed a preferred claim. Held, the …