Law Commons^™

Cleaning Up The Muck: Clarifying The Scope Of Cercla's Potentially Responsible Parties, Matthew K. Telford

Matthew K Telford

Last term, in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States, the Supreme Court clarified the scope of CERCLA’s arranger liability by holding that an arranger must intend to dispose, in order to be held liable as a Potentially Responsible Party (“PRP”). The case sheds light on the Supreme Court’s plain language construction of CERCLA, and its willingness to graft requirements for liability which some consider inconsistent with a strict liability statute. The Court’s decision focuses attention on other PRP disputes, specifically the extent to which a previous owner, one of the four categories of PRP, can be …