Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (2)
- Belmont University (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Collin College (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Voting rights (14)
- Democracy (10)
- Elections (9)
- Election (6)
- Election Law (5)
-
- Election law (5)
- Electoral College (5)
- Suffrage (5)
- Voting (5)
- Disenfranchisement (4)
- Gerrymandering (4)
- Presidential elections (4)
- Electoral college (3)
- Fifteenth Amendment (3)
- Partisanship (3)
- Redistricting (3)
- Textualism (3)
- Voting Rights Act (3)
- Voting Rights Act of 1965 (3)
- 2020 election (2)
- Ballot (2)
- Campaign finance (2)
- Citizens United (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Donald Trump (2)
- Election administration (2)
- Electoral votes (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Government (2)
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (9)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Articles (5)
- Online Publications (4)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (3)
-
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- Penn Program on Regulation Podcasts (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
- Utah Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- All Papers (1)
- Appellate Briefs (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Duquesne Law Review (1)
- Et Cetera (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 88
Full-Text Articles in Law
Faithless Electors And The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact After Chiafalo V. Washington, Coy Westbrook
Faithless Electors And The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact After Chiafalo V. Washington, Coy Westbrook
St. Mary's Law Journal
In conclusion, the opinion of the Court in Chiafalo sets a dangerous precedent. The Court gave the states the power to control and to remove electors who failed to cast their votes in accordance with the candidate who won their state’s electoral votes. However, with the growth of the National Popular Vote now in sixteen jurisdictions, there are questions as to whether the Supreme Court, when faced with a challenge to this interstate compact, would hold that the Compact was in violation of the Constitution. Additionally, with the possibility that the NPVIC may violate state constitutions, there will be rigorous …
Oral Argument In Moore V. Harper And The Perils Of Finding “Compromise” On The Independent State Legislature Theory, Katherine A. Shaw
Oral Argument In Moore V. Harper And The Perils Of Finding “Compromise” On The Independent State Legislature Theory, Katherine A. Shaw
Online Publications
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. Harper was an ominous note on which to end an explosive term. The grant seemed to broadcast an openness to embracing what’s known as the “independent state legislature theory,” or ISLT. It is a once-fringe idea that the U.S. Constitution, and in particular Article I’s “elections clause,” grants to state legislatures alone, and withholds from other state entities (think: courts and constitutions), the power to regulate elections for federal office.
When The Dust Has Settled: Fallout From The 2020 Presidential Election And S.B. 202 Placed Georgia’S Election Code In The Nation’S Crosshairs, William L. Wheeler
When The Dust Has Settled: Fallout From The 2020 Presidential Election And S.B. 202 Placed Georgia’S Election Code In The Nation’S Crosshairs, William L. Wheeler
Mercer Law Review
Long regarded as a “safe” red territory, Georgia was thrust into the center of a national debate on federal and state elections when President Joe Biden flipped the state blue in the 2020 presidential election. In the wee hours of the morning on November 4, 2020, as the final votes were tallied and the electorate results became clear, the Peach State became the ignition point for a fiery, and often hyper-partisan, national debate over federal elections and how states conduct such contests. Due in part to the contrived rhetoric espoused by acolytes of the “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) party, …
Algorithmic Elections, Sarah M.L. Bender
Algorithmic Elections, Sarah M.L. Bender
Michigan Law Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) has entered election administration. Across the country, election officials are beginning to use AI systems to purge voter records, verify mail-in ballots, and draw district lines. Already, these technologies are having a profound effect on voting rights and democratic processes. However, they have received relatively little attention from AI experts, advocates, and policymakers. Scholars have sounded the alarm on a variety of “algorithmic harms” resulting from AI’s use in the criminal justice system, employment, healthcare, and other civil rights domains. Many of these same algorithmic harms manifest in elections and voting but have been underexplored and remain …
American Voter Turnout: The Influence Of Education Levels On Voter Participation, Jack Thomas Bunzel-Hardie
American Voter Turnout: The Influence Of Education Levels On Voter Participation, Jack Thomas Bunzel-Hardie
Student Scholar Symposium Abstracts and Posters
This study is intended to explore the relevant relationship between mistrust in government officials and voter turnout. Within a research article such as this, it is important to distinguish the dependent and independent factors from one another so as not to get them confused. This article identifies the growing sense of mistrust that many Americans feel towards their government officials as the independent factor while examining the relationship that voter turnout has with that growing fear, therefore making that the dependent variable. While this issue has been studied in the past there have been many new events taking place and …
One Person, How Many Votes? Measuring Prison Malapportionment, Ian Bollag-Miller
One Person, How Many Votes? Measuring Prison Malapportionment, Ian Bollag-Miller
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
“One-person, one-vote” is a fundamental principle of democracy. In practice, however, vote distribution among population groups is often less than equal. Even in established democracies, prison malapportionment—the distribution of legislative seats by counting incarcerated people in their prisons’ districts rather than their home districts—is one example of a practice that distorts voter representation. Prison malapportionment allows less populous districts that house prisons to maximize their voting power at the expense of more densely populated districts from which many incarcerated people previously lived. While there has been significant scholarship on the causes and effects of prison malapportionment, there is no standard …
Depoliticizing The Supreme Court Through Term Limits: A Worthwhile Reform Effort, Kara King
Depoliticizing The Supreme Court Through Term Limits: A Worthwhile Reform Effort, Kara King
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
The United States Supreme Court is in a legitimacy crisis. Americans are losing faith in the Supreme Court as an independent branch of government. As a result, policymakers and academics have put forth several proposals to reform the Court. The concept of an eighteen-year term limit maintains some bipartisan support and stands out as the most likely reform. This Article argues that term limits could help depoliticize the nomination process, bring greater stability to the Court, and restore confidence in the Court.
Taking History Seriously: Marjorie Taylor Greene, Reflections On Progressive Lawyering, And Section 3 Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Andrew G. Celli Jr.
Taking History Seriously: Marjorie Taylor Greene, Reflections On Progressive Lawyering, And Section 3 Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Andrew G. Celli Jr.
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
History has lessons to teach, and lawyers can learn from and use history in ways other than by cherry-picking from it. This Article contends that, while American history may be vexed, progressive lawyers can fully embrace history and hold it up into the light for consideration, all in service of progressive ends.
This Article describes a recent litigation that illustrates the point. In March 2022, the Author, together with other lawyers and a non-partisan pro-democracy group, represented voters from Georgia’s fourteenth congressional district in their effort to disqualify U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene from the Georgia ballot—based upon Section 3 …
Updating Anderson-Burdick To Evaluate Partisan Election Manipulation, Andrew Vazquez
Updating Anderson-Burdick To Evaluate Partisan Election Manipulation, Andrew Vazquez
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
This Article analyzes jurisprudence concerning the judicial review of election laws. It suggests that the United States Supreme Court’s approach should acknowledge the realities of political partisanship when reviewing challenged laws and regulations. Specifically, this Article proposes a judicial test to evaluate election laws for partisan biases using factors modeled on those employed by the Court in Gingles v. Thornburg. Simply put, the manipulation of election laws to pursue partisan advantages poses the greatest threat to our democracy. Accordingly, this Article concludes that protecting our democracy from election practices that benefit one party over another in the guise of …
An Anniversary Best Uncelebrated: The 75th Year Of The Presidential Succession Act Of 1947, Roy E. Brownell Ii, John Rogan
An Anniversary Best Uncelebrated: The 75th Year Of The Presidential Succession Act Of 1947, Roy E. Brownell Ii, John Rogan
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
On July 18, 1947, President Harry Truman signed the Presidential Succession Act into law. The 1947 Act placed the Speaker of the House and the Senate president pro tempore in the presidential line of succession. Seventy-five years later, the statute needs major revision. Although the 1947 Act has not been used, the nation’s good fortune may change at any moment, especially given ever-present threats to the health and safety of the president and vice president.
This Article argues that Congress should revise the 1947 law in several ways, most notably by making Cabinet secretaries, in most circumstances, the immediate successors …
Increasing Voter Investment In American Democracy: Proposals For Reform, Adam Drake
Increasing Voter Investment In American Democracy: Proposals For Reform, Adam Drake
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Millions of Americans choose to stay home every election cycle. Polling suggests that these nonvoters are either apathetic with respect to the democratic process or feel alienated from the United States government. Reforms to the democratic system should focus on alleviating these sentiments, ultimately encouraging more voters to show up to the polls. As turnout increases, so too does the legitimacy and stability of the U.S. government.
With that goal in mind, this Article advocates for a five- prong approach to reforming the electoral system. The first proposed step is to eliminate unnecessary barriers to voting by establishing federal automatic …
Making It Harder To Challenge Election Districting, Erwin Chemerinsky
Making It Harder To Challenge Election Districting, Erwin Chemerinsky
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
The Consent Of The Governed And The Right To Access The Ballot, John D. Feerick
The Consent Of The Governed And The Right To Access The Ballot, John D. Feerick
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
I Hope Tilden Was Right, Jerry H. Goldfeder
I Hope Tilden Was Right, Jerry H. Goldfeder
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
Textualism, Judicial Supremacy, And The Independent State Legislature Theory, Leah M. Litman, Katherine A. Shaw
Textualism, Judicial Supremacy, And The Independent State Legislature Theory, Leah M. Litman, Katherine A. Shaw
Articles
This piece offers an extended critique of one aspect of the so-called "independent state legislature" theory. That theory, in brief, holds that the federal Constitution gives state legislatures, and withholds from any other state entity, the power to regulate federal elections. Proponents ground their theory in two provisions of the federal Constitution: Article I's Elections Clause, which provides that "[t]he Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof," and Article H's Presidential Electors Clause, which provides that "[e]ach State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature …
Updating Anderson-Burdick To Evaluate Partisan Manipulation
Updating Anderson-Burdick To Evaluate Partisan Manipulation
Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
This Article analyzes jurisprudence concerning the judicial review of election laws. It suggests that the United States Supreme Court’s approach should acknowledge the realities of political partisanship when reviewing challenged laws and regulations. Specifically, this Article proposes a judicial test to evaluate election laws for partisan biases using factors modeled on those employed by the Court in Gingles v. Thornburg. Simply put, the manipulation of election laws to pursue partisan advantages poses the greatest threat to our democracy. Accordingly, this Article concludes that protecting our democracy from election practices that benefit one party over another in the guise of …
Bizwayo Newton Nkunika V Lawrence Nyirenda And Electoral Commission Of Zambia 2019/Ccz/005 (1 March 2021), O'Brien Kaaba
Bizwayo Newton Nkunika V Lawrence Nyirenda And Electoral Commission Of Zambia 2019/Ccz/005 (1 March 2021), O'Brien Kaaba
SAIPAR Case Review
No abstract provided.
The Court’S Gerrymandering Conundrum: How Hyper-Partisanship In Politics Alters The Rucho Decision, Vince Mancini
The Court’S Gerrymandering Conundrum: How Hyper-Partisanship In Politics Alters The Rucho Decision, Vince Mancini
Utah Law Review
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rucho v. Common Cause was the latest in a line of opinions regarding reviewability of gerrymandering claims related to the constitutionally required decennial state redistricting process. In Rucho, the Court altered the course of future electoral processes and held that partisan gerrymandering claims were nonjusticiable. In doing so, the Court failed to consider obvious pitfalls in limiting the type of review available for these gerrymandering claims. In particular, the Court failed to understand the gravity of the impact such a decision would have on minority voting power and discarded one of the few structural …
The Positive And Negative Purcell Principle, Harry B. Dodsworth
The Positive And Negative Purcell Principle, Harry B. Dodsworth
Utah Law Review
The Purcell Principle—the idea that courts should think twice about changing the rules before elections to avoid confusing voters—is sorely misunderstood. Despite deriving from a three-page opinion, the Purcell Principle has morphed into one of the Supreme Court’s most powerful election-law doctrines. By and large, the Court has interpreted the principle as a bright-line rule barring any judicial intervention close to elections and has overwhelmingly used the principle to uphold voting restrictions. That’s a problem because the Purcell Principle is not a bright-line rule. And it’s certainly not one that rubber stamps voting restrictions. To make matters worse, we know …
More On The Varying Meanings Of “Congress” And “Legislature”, Michael Herz
More On The Varying Meanings Of “Congress” And “Legislature”, Michael Herz
Online Publications
In a recent Election Law Blog post regarding the Independent State Legislature doctrine, Rick Pildes observes that the term “Congress” in the U.S. Constitution sometimes means Congress acting alone and sometimes means Congress acting through legislation. Given that, it makes perfect sense that the term “legislature” can also sometimes mean the one and sometimes the other. I agree. This post just expands the intratextual analysis.
Why The President Should Remain Commander In Chief Of The D.C. National Guard, Christopher F. Melling
Why The President Should Remain Commander In Chief Of The D.C. National Guard, Christopher F. Melling
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amicus Curiae Conference Of Chief Justices In Support Of Neither Party, Moore V. Harper, No. 21-1271 (U.S. Sept. 6, 2022), Evan Caminker, Carter G. Phillips, Virginia A. Seitz, Kathleen M. Mueller
Brief Of Amicus Curiae Conference Of Chief Justices In Support Of Neither Party, Moore V. Harper, No. 21-1271 (U.S. Sept. 6, 2022), Evan Caminker, Carter G. Phillips, Virginia A. Seitz, Kathleen M. Mueller
Appellate Briefs
Founded in 1949, amicus curiae Conference of Chief Justices (the “Conference”) is comprised of the Chief Justices or Chief Judges of the courts of last resort in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Territories of American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. For over 70 years, the Conference has been a leading national voice on important issues concerning the administration of justice in state courts, the operation of state courts and judicial systems, and the role of state courts in our federal system.
The Conference files briefs …
Donald Trump And America's New Class War, Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Donald Trump And America's New Class War, Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Education Freedom Pac V. Reid, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 47 (June 28, 2022), Servando Martinez
Education Freedom Pac V. Reid, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 47 (June 28, 2022), Servando Martinez
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This appeal comes from a district court order enjoining an initiative petition’s circulation and the initiative’s placement on the ballot. In an opinion drafted by Justice Hardesty, the Court considered whether the district court properly denied EFP’s request to dismiss the complaint because the district court had not set the matter for a hearing within 15 days. The Court acknowledges that, under the Nevada Constitution, an initiative petition cannot require appropriations or expenditures, must adequately inform potential signatories about the petition’s goal, and cannot invade the Legislature’s primary role of proposing and enacting laws. The Court concluded that that the …
Cegavske V. Hollowood, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 46 (June 28, 2022), Servando Martinez
Cegavske V. Hollowood, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 46 (June 28, 2022), Servando Martinez
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In an opinion drafted by Justice Stiglich, the Court considered whether initiative sponsors may withdraw a petition or whether an initiative petition’s signatories or the public acquire any rights in a petition. This appeal involves two verified initiative petitions to place questions on the ballot for the Nevada 2022 general election and the sponsors' withdrawal of the initiative petitions. Although Nevada law provides a procedure to withdraw an initiative petition and directs that “no further action may be taken on [a withdrawn] petition,”2 Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske refused to honor the withdrawals of the two petitions at issue here. …
Race And Regulation Podcast Episode 7 - Citizenship, Race, And Political Inequality, Ming Hsu Chen
Race And Regulation Podcast Episode 7 - Citizenship, Race, And Political Inequality, Ming Hsu Chen
Penn Program on Regulation Podcasts
Formal citizenship requirements for political participation excludes not only noncitizens, but also many individuals from racial communities perpetually seen as foreigners. Ming Hsu Chen of the University of California Hastings College of Law looks at regulatory barriers, such as voter ID laws, that inhibit both racial minorities and non-citizens from participating equally in the American political process. She offers proposals for regulatory changes that would create a more equitable political order.
A New Supreme Court Case Threatens Another Body Blow To Our Democracy, Katherine A. Shaw, Leah Litman, Carolyn Shapiro
A New Supreme Court Case Threatens Another Body Blow To Our Democracy, Katherine A. Shaw, Leah Litman, Carolyn Shapiro
Online Publications
When the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, the justices in the majority insisted they were merely returning the issue of abortion to the democratic process. But a case the court has announced it will hear in its October term could make that democratic process a lot less democratic.
Anti-Speech Acts And The First Amendment, Richard K. Sherwin
Anti-Speech Acts And The First Amendment, Richard K. Sherwin
Articles & Chapters
In many states today, there are laws on the books designed to protect the legitimacy and fairness of elections by barring the knowing or reckless dissemination of demonstrably false statements. Regulating this kind of deliberate deception protects the public against the erosion of First Amendment freedoms – such as the freedom to think and express one’s own thoughts and to meaningfully deliberate in an electoral process free from deliberate efforts to flood the zone of public discourse with confusion and mistrust based on deliberate and provable falsehoods. Some of these regulations, however, have been successfully challenged on First Amendment grounds. …
A New Stage In The Struggle For Voting Rights, Lynn Adelman
A New Stage In The Struggle For Voting Rights, Lynn Adelman
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race And Regulation Podcast Episode 4 - Creating An Inclusive National Politics, Guy-Uriel Charles
Race And Regulation Podcast Episode 4 - Creating An Inclusive National Politics, Guy-Uriel Charles
Penn Program on Regulation Podcasts
Throughout American history, racial inequality and political inequality have gone hand-in-hand. Building a truly representative democracy today and in the future will depend on ending racial discrimination in voting. In this episode, election law expert Guy-Uriel Charles of Harvard Law School argues that voting cannot be made a universal and fundamental right for all without nationalizing American election law and blocking states from adopting rules for redistricting and voting that exclude and disenfranchise minority voters. This episode is based on Prof. Charles’s 2021 Distinguished Lecture on Regulation at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School.