Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- AIRC (1)
- Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (1)
- Article II (1)
- Bribery (1)
- Campaign finance regulations (1)
-
- Corruption (1)
- Decision making (1)
- Direct democracy (1)
- Elections Clause (1)
- Elector (1)
- Empirical (1)
- Federal election law (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Grand jury (1)
- Independent state legislature doctrine (1)
- Non-delegation doctrine (1)
- Presidential Electors Clause (1)
- Quid pro quo (1)
- Referendum (1)
- Safe harbors (1)
- Same-sex marriage--Law and legislation (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Voting research (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gender And The Structural Constitution, Paula A. Monopoli
Gender And The Structural Constitution, Paula A. Monopoli
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Freeze Play: Bennett'S Strategy For Entrenching Inequality, Frank A. Pasquale
First Amendment Freeze Play: Bennett'S Strategy For Entrenching Inequality, Frank A. Pasquale
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Marriage On The Ballot: An Analysis Of Same-Sex Marriage Referendums In North Carolina, Minnesota, And Washington During The 2012 Elections, Craig M. Burnett, Mathew D. Mccubbins
Marriage On The Ballot: An Analysis Of Same-Sex Marriage Referendums In North Carolina, Minnesota, And Washington During The 2012 Elections, Craig M. Burnett, Mathew D. Mccubbins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The New Elections Clause, Michael T. Morley
The Appearance And The Reality Of Quid Pro Quo Corruption: An Empirical Investigation, Christopher Robertson, D. Alex Winkelman, Kelly Bergstrand, Darren Modzelewski
The Appearance And The Reality Of Quid Pro Quo Corruption: An Empirical Investigation, Christopher Robertson, D. Alex Winkelman, Kelly Bergstrand, Darren Modzelewski
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court says that campaign finance regulations are unconstitutional unless they target "quid pro quo" corruption or its appearance. To test those appearances, we fielded two studies. First, in a highly realistic simulation, three grand juries deliberated on charges that a campaign spender bribed a Congressperson. Second, 1271 representative online respondents considered whether to convict, with five variables manipulated randomly. In both studies, jurors found quid pro quo corruption for behaviors they believed to be common. This research suggests that Supreme Court decisions were wrongly decided and that Congress and the states have greater authority to regulate campaign finance. …