Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Buckley v. Valeo (1)
- Campaign funds (1)
- Data security (1)
- Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (1)
- Democratic National Committee (1)
-
- Elections (1)
- Equal Rights (1)
- Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) (United States) (1)
- Foreign interference in elections (1)
- Freedom of Association (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Gill v. Whitford (138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018)) (1)
- Locus Standi (1)
- Malware (1)
- McCutcheon v. FEC (1)
- National security (1)
- Political action committees (1)
- Political campaigns (1)
- Russia (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (1)
- United States. Federal Election Commission (1)
- Voting (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Death Of Non-Resident Contribution Limit Bans And The Birth Of The New Small, Swing State, George J. Somi
The Death Of Non-Resident Contribution Limit Bans And The Birth Of The New Small, Swing State, George J. Somi
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
New Hampshire’s 1st Congressional District race in 2018 featured an eye-popping number: 96.7. That figure represents the percentage of candidate Maura Sullivan’s individual contributions derived from out-of-state, non–New Hampshire donors. In August 2018, of the $1.37 million USD of individual contributions that Sullivan had raised, only 3.3%—$46,648 USD—originated from in-state contributors. Sullivan had received individual donations amounting to $497,405 USD from Boston, $216,359 USD from New York City, $101,562 USD from the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, and $92,371 USD from San Francisco.
In nearby Maine, campaign finance reports filed on October 15, 2019, with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) indicate …
Not Gill-Ty: Challenging And Providing A Workable Alternative To The Supreme Court's Gerrymandering Standing Analysis In Gill V. Whitford, Colin Neal
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Protecting The States From Electoral Invasions, Drew Marvel
Protecting The States From Electoral Invasions, Drew Marvel
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Since the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the threat of foreign interference in U.S. elections has loomed large in the minds of the American public. During the 2016 campaign season, Russian government-backed hackers infiltrated the networks and computers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), and various campaign officials, harvesting private information and installing spyware and malware for ongoing intelligence purposes. U.S. intelligence officials have indicated that, using similar tactics, the Russian hackers also targeted election systems and officials in all fifty states, successfully breaching at least two of those states’ election systems, Illinois and Florida. …