Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Use Of Ai-Based Technologies In Arbitrating Trust Disputes, Lee-Ford Tritt
The Use Of Ai-Based Technologies In Arbitrating Trust Disputes, Lee-Ford Tritt
UF Law Faculty Publications
An important debate has emerged concerning the potential application of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") to the arbitration decision-making process. At issue in this debate is the proper role, if any, of AI in rendering binding decisions. Although, to date, AI is not sufficiently developed to replace human arbitrators in making binding decisions, this has not stopped academics, judges, and practitioners from engaging in heated discourse on the topic. Yet, fervent participants on both sides of this debate have confined the parameters of this discussion to arbitration generically, neglecting any application to specific disciplines of law. Insights from these discussions have limited …
Llcs And The Private Ordering Of Dispute Resolution, Peter Molk, Verity Winship
Llcs And The Private Ordering Of Dispute Resolution, Peter Molk, Verity Winship
UF Law Faculty Publications
An emerging question in U.S. business law is how the organizational documents of a business entity set the rules for resolving internal disputes. This practice is routine in commercial contracts, which may specify where or how disputes must be resolved. Recent use of litigation provisions in corporation charters and bylaws have sparked controversy, ultimately leading to legislative action to preserve shareholder suits from contractual waiver. Yet despite accounting for the majority of business organizations and sharing features with corporations, non-corporate business entities and their internal dispute resolution process have been largely ignored. How do these non-corporate entities set ex ante …
Article Iii Judicial Power And The Federal Arbitration Act, Roger J. Perlstadt
Article Iii Judicial Power And The Federal Arbitration Act, Roger J. Perlstadt
UF Law Faculty Publications
Arbitrators determine facts and apply law to those facts to bindingly resolve disputes between two or more parties, a task normally reserved for judges. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) makes agreements to arbitrate disputes enforceable, including disputes that would normally be heard by an Article III judge, such as those arising under federal law or between parties of diverse citizenship. Accordingly, disputes subject to an arbitration agreement brought before a federal court for adjudication must instead, pursuant to the FAA, be resolved by an arbitrator. Yet, while Article III ostensibly mandates that life-tenured and salary-protected judges decide such disputes, arbitrators—selected …
Dr Ethics Book Brings It All Together, Jonathan R. Cohen
Dr Ethics Book Brings It All Together, Jonathan R. Cohen
UF Law Faculty Publications
Dispute resolution practice has changed dramatically over the past several decades. The traditional litigation model has increasingly given way to a “multi-door” vision of varied dispute resolution practices. With that functional change in how we process disputes has come a pressing need to address the varied ethical challenges of these varied practices. Dispute Resolution Ethics is a marvelous contribution toward that effort.