Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Investor-State Arbitration: Economic And Empirical Perspectives, Michael Faure, Wanli Ma
Investor-State Arbitration: Economic And Empirical Perspectives, Michael Faure, Wanli Ma
Michigan Journal of International Law
The investor-state arbitration system (“ISA”) was originally modelled on traditional commercial arbitration and was expected to deliver fast, good, and cheap decisions, especially in comparison to domestic court systems. Yet the ISA system has increasingly been criticized, especially by developing countries. Developing countries claim that the system is not cheap, that decision-making increasingly takes a long time, and that arbitrators are biased in favor of investors (often coming from developed countries in the global North) and against states from the developing South. Several developing states have even withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, which governs the settlement of disputes between investors …
Resolving Economic Disputes In Russia's Market Economy, Karen Halverson
Resolving Economic Disputes In Russia's Market Economy, Karen Halverson
Michigan Journal of International Law
The purpose of this paper is to examine the recent transformation of state arbitrazh into economic courts along with the development of commercial arbitration in Russia, and to consider the relative utility of these mechanisms for resolving disputes in Russia's evolving market economy. Part I describes state arbitrazh and details its evolution into the existing system of economic courts. Part II discusses the past and recent development of commercial arbitration in Russia as an alternative to litigating domestic disputes. Part III considers various social and historic factors that hinder genuine reform.
The International Commercial Arbitration Explosion: More Rules, More Laws, More Books, So What?, James H. Carter
The International Commercial Arbitration Explosion: More Rules, More Laws, More Books, So What?, James H. Carter
Michigan Journal of International Law
Review of The UNCITRAL Framework for Arbitration in Contemporary Perspective by Isaak I. Dore
Drafting The Dispute Resolution Clause, Whitmore Gray
Drafting The Dispute Resolution Clause, Whitmore Gray
Book Chapters
Providing in a contract for ways to resolve disputes that may arise presents a substantial challenge to the lawyer. In one sense, this is what a lawyer regularly does in contract drafting-anticipating misunderstandings or problems that experience has indicated are likely to arise, and trying to provide clear solutions in advance. When it comes to drafting a specific clause for the resolution of further disputes that may arise, however, many lawyers are at a substantial disadvantage. The task comes at the end of the substantive negotiations. The client does not want to focus on, or draw the other party's attention …
The Two-Way Mirror: International Arbitration As Comparative Procedure, Andreas F. Lowenfeld
The Two-Way Mirror: International Arbitration As Comparative Procedure, Andreas F. Lowenfeld
Michigan Journal of International Law
In particular, by focusing on selected aspects of the international procedure of international arbitration, as well as on different approaches to the problem of choosing the source of the law to be applied, the author hopes to give the outsider some feeling for the process, and some perception of how international arbitration is different both from domestic arbitration and from litigation in national courts. The author has an additional purpose, as well, however, though: to be sure not to sound too pretentious about it. Focusing on the record, on discovery, on examination of witnesses, and on choosing a choice of …
Incorporation Of State Law Under The Federal Arbitration Act, Michigan Law Review
Incorporation Of State Law Under The Federal Arbitration Act, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note proposes a solution to this choice-of-law problem. Section I surveys the courts' response to Congress's silence and finds confusion and disarray. Section II argues that courts should apply the state law pertinent to arbitration unless that law places heavier burdens on arbitration contracts than on other contracts; where state law does discriminatorily burden arbitration, the courts should apply the pertinent state rules applicable to "any contract." It concludes that the "grounds . . . for the revocation of any contract," although determined as a matter of federal policy, are to be found in state law rather than in …