Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Dispute Resolution and Arbitration

Southern Methodist University

2021

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

International Arbitration, Manuel Liatowitsch, Jeffrey Rosenthal, Christopher P. Denicola, Elizabeth M. Hanly, Mauricio Becerra De La Roca Donoso, Diepiriye Anga, James Menz, Guido Carducci, Medhavi Singh, Hanns-Christian Salger, Luping Zhang, Adam Al-Sarraf, Bruno Guandalini, Clifford J. Hendel, Tamari J. Lagilava May 2021

International Arbitration, Manuel Liatowitsch, Jeffrey Rosenthal, Christopher P. Denicola, Elizabeth M. Hanly, Mauricio Becerra De La Roca Donoso, Diepiriye Anga, James Menz, Guido Carducci, Medhavi Singh, Hanns-Christian Salger, Luping Zhang, Adam Al-Sarraf, Bruno Guandalini, Clifford J. Hendel, Tamari J. Lagilava

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.


Taxing Employers For Imposing Mandatory Arbitration, Class Action Waiver, And Nondisclosure Of Dispute Provisions, Rebecca N. Morrow Jan 2021

Taxing Employers For Imposing Mandatory Arbitration, Class Action Waiver, And Nondisclosure Of Dispute Provisions, Rebecca N. Morrow

SMU Law Review

Employers impose coercive dispute resolution terms on their employees more frequently, more broadly, and with greater legal success than ever before. Recent survey data indicates that mandatory employment arbitration provisions bind more than 60 million American workers—over half of the U.S. private-sector nonunion workforce. Employment class action waivers bind nearly 25 million American workers. In 2018, the Supreme Court held 5–4 that mandatory arbitration provisions and class action waivers imposed by employers on their employees do not violate the National Labor Relations Act. These terms prohibit employees from exposing employer wrongdoing in open court, bar employees with valid wage and …