Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Between Killing And Letting Die In Criminal Law, Roni M. Rosenberg
Between Killing And Letting Die In Criminal Law, Roni M. Rosenberg
Roni M Rosenberg
ABSTRACT The distinction between act and omission is deeply embedded in our legal thinking. Criminal law distinguishes sharply between harmful actions and harmful omissions and, consequently, between killing and letting die. The distinction between act and omission is not made solely under criminal law as it is rooted in the foundations of common morality, which emphasizes not only the results but also the conduct that produced those results.Nevertheless, since the beginning of the 1960s, there has been a significant movement to attack and criticize the moral distinction between killing and letting die. The primary question is whether there is, in …
Two Models Of "Absence Of Movement" In Criminal Jurisprudence, Roni M. Rosenberg
Two Models Of "Absence Of Movement" In Criminal Jurisprudence, Roni M. Rosenberg
Roni M Rosenberg
ABSTRACTThe distinction between act and omission is deeply embedded in our legal thinking. In criminal jurisprudence, in order to convict someone of committing an act that caused harm, any act will suffice .On the other hand, to convict based on an omission that caused harm it is necessary to identify a duty to act on the part of the defendant, such that breach of that duty caused the harm.The generally accepted approach in criminal jurisprudence is to define act and omission under the bodily movement test. This essay critiques that approach and points to the fact that American jurisprudence is …