Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Testimony (2)
- Aaron Burr (1)
- Absence (1)
- Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann (1)
- Anderson v. United States (1)
-
- Appeals (1)
- Character evidence (1)
- Collateral attacks (1)
- Constitutional immunity (1)
- Contempt of court (1)
- Definition (1)
- Detention (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- Draft (1)
- Due process (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Ex parte Bollman (1)
- Excused (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Homicide (1)
- In re Willie (1)
- Income tax (1)
- Insanity (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Johnson v. United States (1)
- Jury (1)
- Kentucky (1)
- Liquor law (1)
- McNabb v. United States (1)
- Michigan (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Proposed Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Wendell Berge
The Proposed Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Wendell Berge
Michigan Law Review
The recently published Preliminary Draft of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is now before the bench and bar for discussion. The rules proposed are, of course, tentative. Following a procedure similar to that adopted in the case of the civil rules a few years ago, they have been printed and distributed by the Advisory Committee at this stage for the purpose of obtaining criticisms and suggestions. Some of the rules merely restate existing law as provided by statute or adopted by general agreement in judicial decisions. Others work substantial procedural changes. How is the product to be judged?
Searches And Seizures-The Criterion Of Reasonableness
Searches And Seizures-The Criterion Of Reasonableness
Michigan Law Review
Epithetical jurisprudence is an easy way out of difficulty. Find some term to the use of which established law has commonly attached a consequence; apply that term to the fact situation at hand; the legal consequence is automatically determined. If it happens that the new fact situation is not quite like those to which the term has previously been applied, the term has unobtrusively acquired a new significance; but the forms of logical decision have been followed. One perennial illustration of that epithetical process is the judicial determination that a particular search or seizure is "reasonable" or "unreasonable" epithets whose …
Witnesses-Privilege Against Self-Incrimination-Effect Of Incorrect Decision By Trial Judge In Compelling Answer When Privilege Asserted
Michigan Law Review
ln a judicial proceeding, a question is asked of a witness, which question he declines to answer, claiming that the answer will tend to incriminate him. The judge orders him to answer. He does so and the answer does incriminate him. What happens?
Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Presence Of Accused During Arguments Of Law, Arthur B. Lathrop
Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Presence Of Accused During Arguments Of Law, Arthur B. Lathrop
Michigan Law Review
The defendant was indicted for a felony on charges of wilfully attempting to "evade or defeat'' federal income taxes based on his failure to report money allegedly received by him from "backers" of numbers games in exchange for political protection. On cross-examination he was questioned about certain payments made in the year following the ones on which the indictment was based. His attorney objected on the ground that the question was going to be the subject of another indictment against the defendant, and asked that the jury be dismissed while an argument was had upon the point of law raised. …
Habeas Corpus As A Method Of Review-Prohibition-Mandamus
Habeas Corpus As A Method Of Review-Prohibition-Mandamus
Michigan Law Review
It is a well-settled rule, sustained by innumerable cases, that errors and irregularities committed by a court within the sphere of its jurisdiction cannot be inquired into in habeas corpus proceedings. The reason commonly given for this rule is that such a proceeding is a collateral attack on the judgment, and a collateral attack is necessarily limited to the inquiry whether the court has acted without jurisdiction or has exceeded its jurisdiction.
Further On Appeals By The State In Criminal Cases State V. Rosen
Further On Appeals By The State In Criminal Cases State V. Rosen
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Character Of Deceased And Uncommunicated Threats By Deceased In Homicide Cases, Henry Howe Bramblet
Character Of Deceased And Uncommunicated Threats By Deceased In Homicide Cases, Henry Howe Bramblet
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Evidence: Effect Of Conviction In Subsequent Civil Suit, Henry Howe Bramblet
Evidence: Effect Of Conviction In Subsequent Civil Suit, Henry Howe Bramblet
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Critique Of The Test Of Insanity In Criminal Cases In Kentucky, Carleton M. Davis
A Critique Of The Test Of Insanity In Criminal Cases In Kentucky, Carleton M. Davis
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Effect Of Comment On Failure Of Defendant To Testify In Kentucky, Robert M. Spragens
Effect Of Comment On Failure Of Defendant To Testify In Kentucky, Robert M. Spragens
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.