Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Search (2)
- Seizure (2)
- Abuse (1)
- Agreement (1)
- Appeal (1)
-
- Appellate (1)
- Arraignment (1)
- Assault (1)
- Assistance (1)
- Attempt (1)
- Bush (1)
- Call (1)
- Clinton (1)
- Cocaine (1)
- Confrontation (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Contempt (1)
- Control (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Disparity (1)
- Drug (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Escape (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Expert (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Fraud (1)
- GPS (1)
- Guideline (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Criminal Law And Procedure, Virginia B. Theisen, Stephen R. Mccullough
Criminal Law And Procedure, Virginia B. Theisen, Stephen R. Mccullough
University of Richmond Law Review
The authors have endeavored to select from the many cases and bills those that have the most significant practical impact on the daily practice of criminal law in the Commonwealth. Due to space constraints, the authors have stayed away from discussing settled principles, with a focus on the "take away" for a particular case.
The Anatomy Of A Search: Intrusiveness And The Fourth Amendment, Renée Mcdonald Hutchins
The Anatomy Of A Search: Intrusiveness And The Fourth Amendment, Renée Mcdonald Hutchins
University of Richmond Law Review
In this essay, I contend that when evaluating the constitutionality of enhanced surveillance devices, the existing test for assessing the occurrence of a Fourth Amendment search should be modified. Specifically, I suggest that intrusiveness should be unambiguously adopted by the Court as the benchmark for assessing and defining the existence of a search under the Fourth Amendment. Moreover, intrusiveness should be clearly defined to require an examination of two factors: the functionality of a challenged form of surveillance and the potential for disclosure created by the device.
The Process Is The Problem: Lessons Learned From United States Drug Sentencing Reform, Erik S. Siebert
The Process Is The Problem: Lessons Learned From United States Drug Sentencing Reform, Erik S. Siebert
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.