Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal rule of criminal procedure (2)
- Guilty plea (2)
- Rule 11 (2)
- United States v. Dominguez Benitez (2)
- Asset forfeiture (1)
-
- Betts v. Brady (1)
- Citations (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Compensatory civil sanctions (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Due process (1)
- Expert witness (1)
- Forensic evidence (1)
- Gideon (1)
- Johnson v. Zerbst (1)
- Misconduct (1)
- Police federal grant programs (1)
- Police performance evaluation (1)
- Powell v. Alabama (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- United States v. Brown (1)
- United States v. Himenez-Antunez (1)
- United States v. Mota-Santana (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
In Their Defense: Conflict Between The Criminal Defendant’S Right To Counsel Of Choice And The Right To Appointed Counsel, Kit Thomas
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Virginia’S Interpretation Of Ake V. Oklahoma: A Hollow Right, Andrew Monaghan Higgins
Virginia’S Interpretation Of Ake V. Oklahoma: A Hollow Right, Andrew Monaghan Higgins
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Commodifying Policing: A Recipe For Community-Police Tensions, Nora V. Demleitner
Commodifying Policing: A Recipe For Community-Police Tensions, Nora V. Demleitner
Scholarly Articles
This Article, in Part II, begins with a description of how municipalities, at least since the recession of 2008, have fallen short of fully funding their departments. Part III focuses on four distinct outside funding components and their impact on policing. The first subsection discusses asset forfeitures, under both state and federal law. Subsection two highlights revenue derived from citations, often in the form of traffic tickets. A discussion of fees that are being added to fines, often to fund courts, probation agencies, and police departments, follows. The increasing amounts and types of fees imposed have substantially increased the burden …
Measuring A Civil-Discovery Sanction For Failure To Turn Over Requested Material: Goodyear Tire V. Haeger (15-1406), Doug Rendleman
Measuring A Civil-Discovery Sanction For Failure To Turn Over Requested Material: Goodyear Tire V. Haeger (15-1406), Doug Rendleman
Scholarly Articles
A sanction that is unrelated to misconduct is criminal and requires criminal instead of civil procedure. In a product liability lawsuit, the respondent, Goodyear, failed to turn over important tests before the parties settled. The petitioners, the Haegers—a couple who alleged Goodyear’s tires caused injuries—sought approval of a sanction based on their attorney fees. Complex and technical civil procedural rules and statutes, contempt, and the court’s inherent power will govern the Supreme Court’s decision. The issue before the Court is the specificity of the causal link between Goodyear’s misconduct and the amount of the civil sanction.
Examining Rule 11(B)(1)(N) Error: Guilty Pleas, Appellate Waiver, And Dominguez Benitez, Leanna C. Minix
Examining Rule 11(B)(1)(N) Error: Guilty Pleas, Appellate Waiver, And Dominguez Benitez, Leanna C. Minix
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Waivering About The Dirty Business Of Plea Bargains—A Comment, Jonathan Shapiro
Waivering About The Dirty Business Of Plea Bargains—A Comment, Jonathan Shapiro
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.