Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment (2)
- Racial discrimination (2)
- Batson v. Kentucky (1)
- Brecht v. Abrahamson (1)
- Brecht-Kotteakos rule (1)
-
- Capital Jury Project (1)
- Capital jurors (1)
- Capital jury instructions (1)
- Chapman rule (1)
- Chapman v. California (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Equal protection clause (1)
- Future dangerousness (1)
- Harmless error rule (1)
- Hernandez v. New York (1)
- Juror beliefs about burden of proof (1)
- Jury selection (1)
- Kotteakos v. United States (1)
- Peremptory challenges (1)
- Richmond principle (1)
- Richmond v. Lewis (1)
- State v. Simmons (1)
- Voir dire (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Deadly Confusion: Juror Instructions In Capital Cases, Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells
Deadly Confusion: Juror Instructions In Capital Cases, Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
A fatal mistake. A defendant is sentenced to die because the jury was misinformed about the law. The justice system should be designed to prevent such a tragic error. Yet our interviews with jurors who served in South Carolina capital cases indicate that this nightmare is a reality.
Although our data are limited to South Carolina, the question whether jurors are adequately instructed in capital cases is of national concern. For example, the issue whether jurors should be more fully informed about the alternative to a death sentence has arisen in other states. And the question whether jurors understand the …
Harmless Error In Federal Habeas Corpus After Brecht V. Abrahamson, John H. Blume, Stephen P. Garvey
Harmless Error In Federal Habeas Corpus After Brecht V. Abrahamson, John H. Blume, Stephen P. Garvey
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The law of habeas corpus has changed again. This time it was the law of harmless error. Before Brecht v. Abrahamson, the courts applied the same harmless error rule on direct appeal and in federal habeas corpus. Under that rule, embraced for constitutional errors in Chapman v. California, a conviction tainted by a constitutional error susceptible to harmless error analysis could be upheld only if the state demonstrated that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. After Brecht, the venerable Chapman rule still applies to constitutional errors identified and reviewed on direct appeal, but an ostensibly "less …
The Langugage And Culture (Not To Say Race) Of Peremptory Challenges, Sheri Lynn Johnson
The Langugage And Culture (Not To Say Race) Of Peremptory Challenges, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Racial Imagery In Criminal Cases, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Racial Imagery In Criminal Cases, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.