Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (3)
- Domestic violence (2)
- Sturm College of Law (2)
- Capital crimes (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
-
- Corporation as client (1)
- Crawford v. Washington (1)
- Crimmigration (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Dichotomies (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Furman v. Georgia (1)
- Gender violence (1)
- Immigration law (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Lawyers’ ethics (1)
- Legalization of regulation (1)
- Marijuana law reform in states (1)
- Marijuana reform in Colorado (1)
- Marijuana regulation (1)
- Professional ethics (1)
- Public lawyers (1)
- Risk (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Public Lawyers And Marijuana Regulation, Sam Kamin, Eli Wald
Public Lawyers And Marijuana Regulation, Sam Kamin, Eli Wald
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Although 23 states and the District of Columbia have now legalized marijuana for medical purposes, marijuana remains a prohibited substance under federal law. Because the production, sale, possession and use of marijuana remain illegal, there is a risk of prosecution under federal laws. Furthermore, those who help marijuana users and providers put themselves at risk — federal law punishes not only those who violate drug laws but also those who assist or conspire with them to do so. In the case of lawyers representing marijuana users and businesspeople, this means not only the real (though remote) risk of criminal prosecution …
Remember Not To Forget Furman: A Response To Professor Smith, Sam Kamin, Justin F. Marceau
Remember Not To Forget Furman: A Response To Professor Smith, Sam Kamin, Justin F. Marceau
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Professor Robert J. Smith encourages readers, lawyers, and courts to forget Furman v. Georgia and to focus instead on death penalty challenges grounded in the diminished culpability of nearly all capital defendants. We applaud Professor Smith’s call to focus on the mental and emotional characteristics that reduce the blameworthiness of so many of those charged with capital crimes; recognizing diminished culpability as the rule rather than the exception among capital defendants conveys a reality that rarely finds its way into reported cases. We are troubled, however, by Professor Smith’s call to “forget Furman.” We believe the title and the …
The Battle Of The Bulge: The Surprising Last Stand Against State Marijuana Legalization, Sam Kamin
The Battle Of The Bulge: The Surprising Last Stand Against State Marijuana Legalization, Sam Kamin
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Although marijuana possession remains a federal crime, twenty-three states now allow use of marijuana for medical purposes and four states have adopted tax-and-regulate policies permitting use and possession by those twenty-one and over. In this article, I examine recent developments regarding marijuana regulation. I show that the Obama administration, after initially sending mixed signals, has taken several steps indicating an increasingly accepting position toward marijuana law reform in states; however the current situation regarding the dual legal status of marijuana is at best an unstable equilibrium. I also focus on what might be deemed the last stand of marijuana-legalization opponents, …
Three Dichotomies In Lawyers’ Ethics (With Particular Attention To The Corporation As Client), Stephen Pepper
Three Dichotomies In Lawyers’ Ethics (With Particular Attention To The Corporation As Client), Stephen Pepper
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Three usually unexpressed, and too often unnoticed, conceptual dichotomies underlie our perception and understanding of lawyers’ ethics. First, the existence of a special body of professional ethics and professional regulation presupposes some special need or risk. Criminal and civil law are apparently insufficient. Ordinary day-to-day morality and ordinary ethics, likewise, are not considered to be enough. What is the risk entailed by the notion of a profession that is special; who needs protection, and from what? Two quite different possible answers to this question provide the first of the three dichotomies examined in this article: one can understand the risk …
The Life Of Crimmigration Law, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández
The Life Of Crimmigration Law, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
This short essay introduces a collection of articles that arose from the Denver University Law Review’s symposium Crimmigration: Crossing the Border Between Criminal Law and Immigration Law, held in February 2015 at the University ofDenver Sturm College of Law. The essay borrows heavily from the Epilogue to my book Crimmigration Law.
Domestic Violence And The Confrontation Clause: The Case For A Prompt Post-Arrest Confrontation Hearing, Robert M. Hardaway
Domestic Violence And The Confrontation Clause: The Case For A Prompt Post-Arrest Confrontation Hearing, Robert M. Hardaway
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Part I and Part II of this article discuss the consequences of Crawford v. Washington for domestic violence victims and detail the problem of domestic violence in America, including the current prosecution strategies and challenges in domestic violence cases. Part III reviews the evolution of confrontation law jurisprudence. Part IV sets forth a proposed Crawford-compliant procedure that also protects domestic violence victims. Part V addresses anticipated objections to the prompt-post arrest confrontation hearing.
Panel On Problematizing Assumptions About Gender Violence (Transcript), Rashmi Goel, Tamara Love, Elizabeth Macdowell, Adele Morrison
Panel On Problematizing Assumptions About Gender Violence (Transcript), Rashmi Goel, Tamara Love, Elizabeth Macdowell, Adele Morrison
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Transcript of a Panel session at the CONVERGE! Conference on problematizing assumptions about gender violence.