Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

In Re Bandmann, Jesse W. Carter Dec 1958

In Re Bandmann, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

An inmate's application for a writ of habeas corpus based upon an improper sentence being imposed was denied and the matter was remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the sentence.


In Re Osslo [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Dec 1958

In Re Osslo [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Two probationers could reject probation that they did not assent to at trial after the final appeal was decided because they never manifested acceptance of the terms of the probation, especially a prohibition from holding union offices.


Tupper V. Superior Court Of Marin County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Nov 1958

Tupper V. Superior Court Of Marin County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Where an accused's commitment was not based entirely on incompetent evidence, a writ of prohibition did not lie to review of the ruling of the magistrate on a procedural matter.


In Re Petersen [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1958

In Re Petersen [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Ordinances allowing a police chief to designate exclusive taxicab stands and prohibiting competing companies from standing therein, was a valid exercise of a municipality's police power and was not invalidly discriminatory.


Gomez V. Superior Court Of Mendocino County, Jesse W. Carter Jul 1958

Gomez V. Superior Court Of Mendocino County, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Where petitioners were charged with grand theft, but the jury found them guilty only of petty theft, which judgment was reversed on appeal, they could not later be retried for grand theft, because double jeopardy protections attached.


People V. Friend [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jun 1958

People V. Friend [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

The comments of the judge were in keeping with the Constitution and the established limitations on his power, and there was no sound basis for concluding that the question of penalty was not fairly tried.


People V. Osslo [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1958

People V. Osslo [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Sufficient evidence supported the conviction of eight criminal defendants for conspiracy and assault when they beat up the retail clerk union's business agent who reportedly infringed on the butcher union's business.


People V. Wilburn, Jesse W. Carter Feb 1958

People V. Wilburn, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Although defendant engaged in a shoot-out with a retired police officer who walked in on a robbery, the evidence pointed to the conclusion that a bullet fired from defendant's gun killed a decedent. Thus, he was guilty of first-degree murder.