Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Choice of law (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Admissions (1)
- Article III Courts (1)
- Carey v. Piphus (1)
-
- Caseload (1)
- Chicanos (1)
- Commercial arbitration (1)
- Connecticut (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Damages (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Enrollments (1)
- Evans Report (1)
- Federal Arbitration Act (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Government misconduct (1)
- History (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Institutional defendants (1)
- International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1)
- LSAT (1)
- Latinos (1)
- Law schools (1)
- Legal standards (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Minority lawyers (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Court Examination Of The Discovery File On A Motion For Summary Judgment, Michigan Law Review
Court Examination Of The Discovery File On A Motion For Summary Judgment, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the history and ambiguous language of rule 56 to determine whether courts have a duty to examine the discovery file before granting a summary judgment. Section I discusses courts' differing interpretations of the rule. Section II shows that the Supreme Court Advisory Committee which drafted the rule contemplated that courts would examine routinely filed discovery materials when considering a motion for summary judgment. Section III concludes, however, that the expansion of pre-trial discovery since the enactment of the federal rules renders such a trial court duty inconsistent with the drafters' intent that the rules "be construed to …
Constitutional Torts, Christina B. Whitman
Constitutional Torts, Christina B. Whitman
Articles
In this Article, I analyze the significance of the overlap between state tort law remedies and remedies under section 1983. I conclude that the dissatisfaction with section 1983 cannot fairly be attributed to the fact that it has been read to provide a remedy that "supplements" state law. I argue that most of the anxiety over constitutional damage actions under section 1983 can be understood - and resolved - only by focusing on two other questions. The first of these concerns the appropriate reach of the Constitution. Ambivalence about section 1983 reflects, in part, a fear that the federal Constitution …
Incorporation Of State Law Under The Federal Arbitration Act, Michigan Law Review
Incorporation Of State Law Under The Federal Arbitration Act, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note proposes a solution to this choice-of-law problem. Section I surveys the courts' response to Congress's silence and finds confusion and disarray. Section II argues that courts should apply the state law pertinent to arbitration unless that law places heavier burdens on arbitration contracts than on other contracts; where state law does discriminatorily burden arbitration, the courts should apply the pertinent state rules applicable to "any contract." It concludes that the "grounds . . . for the revocation of any contract," although determined as a matter of federal policy, are to be found in state law rather than in …
Personal Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law, James Martin
Personal Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law, James Martin
Michigan Law Review
The time has come for the Supreme Court to declare that a state may not apply its own law to a case unless it has the "minimum contacts" required by International Shoe for the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Although the present state of the law is less than certain, the Supreme Court has not yet required that a state show it has minimum contacts with a defendant before applying its law. As a result, in some cases where a state has obtained personal jurisdiction because of a defendant's contacts unrelated to the case - contacts such …
The Role Of Ideas In Legal History, Jay M. Feinman
The Role Of Ideas In Legal History, Jay M. Feinman
Michigan Law Review
A review of Patterns of American Legal Thought by G. Edward White
The Process Is The Punishment: Handling Cases In A Lower Criminal Court, Michigan Law Review
The Process Is The Punishment: Handling Cases In A Lower Criminal Court, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Book Notice about The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court by Malcolm M. Feeley
Minority Preferences In Law School Admissions, Terrance Sandalow
Minority Preferences In Law School Admissions, Terrance Sandalow
Book Chapters
In addressing the subject of "reverse discrimination," I want to caution at the outset against permitting the use of the word "discrimination" to prejudice consideration of the subject. "Discrimination" has, in recent years, become a bad word. It tends to be used as a shorthand for "unjustifiably unequal treatment." In its original and still proper meaning, however, the word is quite neutral. Discrimination merely means differentiation. It comes from a Latin word that means "to distinguish." Accordingly, when we discriminate-i.e., when we differentiate or distinguish-among people, the propriety of our action depends upon the reasons that we have acted as …