Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Courts

1976

Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 979

Full-Text Articles in Law

Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-1035 Dec 1976

Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-1035

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Reply Brief (P) 1975-Sc-1035 Dec 1976

Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Reply Brief (P) 1975-Sc-1035

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Appellate Supervision Of Remedies In Public Law Adjudication, Robert L. Hinkle Dec 1976

Appellate Supervision Of Remedies In Public Law Adjudication, Robert L. Hinkle

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Book Review Of By What Right? A Commentary On The Superem Court's Power To Revise The Constitution, Stephen R. Munzer Dec 1976

Book Review Of By What Right? A Commentary On The Superem Court's Power To Revise The Constitution, Stephen R. Munzer

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Omnibus Hearing: Benefit Or Burden For State Courts?, Joel J. Fryer Dec 1976

The Omnibus Hearing: Benefit Or Burden For State Courts?, Joel J. Fryer

Mercer Law Review

The inefficiency of the criminal justice system has come to be recognized by judicial reformers as a major problem that has been exacerbated by the expansion of the rights of defendants. During the past 15 years, largely in response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions attempting to insure due process and promote fairness, trial courts have had to accommodate not only the resultant changes in criminal practice and procedure but also the increased caseload caused by defendants' assertion of constitutional rights which have been recently articulated and guaranteed. The recognition that the burden placed on courts must not be so great …


Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench Dec 1976

Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench

Michigan Law Review

The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since it is now well established that state courts have the constitutional power to adjudicate federal causes of action if Congress so desires, the significant questions concern the method by which the judiciary is to decipher congressional intent. Although the courts have no difficulty where Congress has explicitly addressed the issue of state court jurisdiction, problems do arise in situations where Congress has remained silent on the question. The first section critically examines the traditional criteria employed by the courts for determining congressional intent …


Judicial Review Of Private Hospital Activities, Michigan Law Review Dec 1976

Judicial Review Of Private Hospital Activities, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note will examine the judicial review of hospitals under state law and the fourteenth amendment and will suggest that unless certain clear requirements for "publicness" are met, judicial restraint based on the failure of legislative institutions to mandate judicial interference is the better course.


Robert D. Sykes V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0362 Nov 1976

Robert D. Sykes V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0362

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Billy Lewis Freeman V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0388 Nov 1976

Billy Lewis Freeman V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0388

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Dorothy M. Fraze V. John H. Fraze, Jr., Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0457 Nov 1976

Dorothy M. Fraze V. John H. Fraze, Jr., Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0457

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Jimmy Keith Self V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0106 Nov 1976

Jimmy Keith Self V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0106

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Catherine Wendell, Executrix Of The Estate Of Fred D. Stone, Dec'd., Et Al V. Bessie Stone, Et Al, Petition For Rehearing 1974-Sc-1144 Nov 1976

Catherine Wendell, Executrix Of The Estate Of Fred D. Stone, Dec'd., Et Al V. Bessie Stone, Et Al, Petition For Rehearing 1974-Sc-1144

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings: A Comment, David P. Doane Nov 1976

Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings: A Comment, David P. Doane

Michigan Law Review

Professors Clark and Merryman propose a useful indirect measure of the duration of litigation whose primary virtue is its ease of computation from published court data. As the authors note, such a measure of duration may be useful to persons involved in judicial administration and to attorneys formulating strategy in litigation, and the legal community should find informative their illustration of the concept with Italian court data. Concluding on a pragmatic note, Professors Clark and Merryman appear to suggest that attorneys, clients, judges, court administrators, and social scientists must ultimately assess the utility of their concept. In making this assessment, …


Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings, David S. Clark, John Henry Merryman Nov 1976

Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings, David S. Clark, John Henry Merryman

Michigan Law Review

A method of estimating the probable duration of litigation is useful for a variety of purposes. First, the probable duration of a case may, to some extent, determine strategy in litigation since prolonged litigation is often perceived as an appreciable cost to one party and as a benefit to the other. An estimate of the duration of a criminal case, for example, probably influences the respective postures of a defendant and a prosecutor in plea bargaining. Similarly, civil litigants may be able to use an estimate of the probable duration of litigation, together with other factors, in deciding whether to …


Julian H. Adams V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0294 Oct 1976

Julian H. Adams V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0294

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Wallace Oscar Boyd V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0392 Oct 1976

Wallace Oscar Boyd V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0392

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Walter E. Parido V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0382 Oct 1976

Walter E. Parido V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0382

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Ronnie Meadows V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0056 Oct 1976

Ronnie Meadows V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0056

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


George R. Wagoner, Acting Commissioner Of Labor And Custodian Of The Special Fund V. Charles Ray Griffey, The Workmen's Compensation Board Of Kentucky, Lee Furniture Company And Bituminous Casualty Company, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0963 Oct 1976

George R. Wagoner, Acting Commissioner Of Labor And Custodian Of The Special Fund V. Charles Ray Griffey, The Workmen's Compensation Board Of Kentucky, Lee Furniture Company And Bituminous Casualty Company, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0963

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


James Cook V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0417 Oct 1976

James Cook V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0417

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1976

Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1976

Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


The Impact Of The Courts On Public Administration, David L. Bazelon Oct 1976

The Impact Of The Courts On Public Administration, David L. Bazelon

Indiana Law Journal

Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench


Essays From The Bench (Introduction), Eugene A. Wright Oct 1976

Essays From The Bench (Introduction), Eugene A. Wright

Indiana Law Journal

Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench


American Advocacy - Foundation Of The American Dream, Thomas D. Lambros Oct 1976

American Advocacy - Foundation Of The American Dream, Thomas D. Lambros

Indiana Law Journal

Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench


The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal Oct 1976

The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal

Indiana Law Journal

Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench


Institutional Reform In The Federal Courts, Alan Betten Oct 1976

Institutional Reform In The Federal Courts, Alan Betten

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Objectivity And Habeas Corpus: Should Federal District Court Judges Be Permitted To Rule Upon The Validity Of Their Own Criminal Trial Conduct?, Marilyn L. Kelley Oct 1976

Objectivity And Habeas Corpus: Should Federal District Court Judges Be Permitted To Rule Upon The Validity Of Their Own Criminal Trial Conduct?, Marilyn L. Kelley

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

It has already been suggested that one of the main purposes of section 2255 was to provide a convenient forum in which the trial judge might testify, if necessary. That purpose is, obviously, contrary to the interpretation rendered in Carvell.

Beyond this inconsistency, Carvell suggests two significant issues: first, that it is highly desirable that the motions be passed upon by the judge who is familiar with the facts; and second, that the criminal trial judge is not likely to be misled by allegations in the 2255 petition as to what had occurred. The first issue raises the question …


Judicial Law Making And Administration, Roger C. Cramton Oct 1976

Judicial Law Making And Administration, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Federal Trial Judge's Reflections On The Preparation For And Trial Of Civil Cases, Charles R. Richey Oct 1976

Federal Trial Judge's Reflections On The Preparation For And Trial Of Civil Cases, Charles R. Richey

Indiana Law Journal

Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench