Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Ashcraft v. Tennessee (1)
- Beer v. Continental Airlines (In re Continental Airlines) (1)
- Berkemer v. McCarty (1)
- Blume v. County of Ramsey (1)
- Bosworth v. Pledger (1)
-
- CWO v. Commissioner of Revenue (1)
- City of Duluth v. Minnesota (1)
- Columbia Sun v. Department of Revenue (1)
- Craftmasters v. Department of Revenue (1)
- Dav-Con v. State Board of Tax Commissioners (1)
- Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons (1)
- Department of Revenue v. ACF Industries (1)
- Edgewater Inn v. Department of Revenue (1)
- Fare v. Michael C. (1)
- Fedway Assoc. v. Director Division of Taxation (1)
- Gallegos v. Colorado (1)
- Gay v. City of Springdale (1)
- Grogg v. Commonwealth (1)
- Harris v. Commonwealth (1)
- Horizon Bancorp NA v. Indiana Department of State of Revenue (1)
- In re Gault (1)
- In re Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romero on House Bill 91S-1005 (1)
- Johnson v. Commonwealth (1)
- Keeter Mfg. v. Department of Revenue (1)
- Legislative Research Commission v. Brown (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Miranda warning (1)
- Missouri ex rel. May Department Stores v. Koupal (1)
- Novak v. Commonwealth (1)
- People v. Mitchell (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Enterprise Zones In The Courts: Legal Challenges To State Economic Redevelopment Legislation, Patrick J. Skelley Ii
Enterprise Zones In The Courts: Legal Challenges To State Economic Redevelopment Legislation, Patrick J. Skelley Ii
University of Richmond Law Review
The declining state of our nation's cities has been, and continues to be, a frequent source of news and fodder for political debate. Unemployment, urban blight, crime, and economic dislocation are just a few of the inner-city's afflictions which occupy the American mind. A multitude of theories have been advanced in order to explain the persistence of urban deterioration, accompanied by an array of governmental attempts to reverse, or at least stem, the trend of inner-city decay.
Novak V. Commonwealth: Are Virginia Courts Providing Special Protection To Virginia's Juvenile Defendants?, Ellen R. Fulmer
Novak V. Commonwealth: Are Virginia Courts Providing Special Protection To Virginia's Juvenile Defendants?, Ellen R. Fulmer
University of Richmond Law Review
On March 9, 1991, Shawn Paul Novak was charged with the murder of two young boys, Daniel Grier, age nine, and Christopher Weaver, age seven. The boys had disappeared on March 4 and their bodies were found the next day after an extensive search. The police inquiry into the murders led to the questioning of a number of people, including Shawn, then age sixteen. Shawn was questioned on four separate occasions. At no time prior to, during, or after any of these questioning sessions was Shawn read his Mirandawarnings which specify the rights to which he was entitled under the …