Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- APA (1)
- Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP II) (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v. Simmenthal (1)
- BLM (1)
-
- Brunner v. The European Union Treaty (1)
- Bureau of Land Management (1)
- CEQ (1)
- City of Davis v. Coleman (1)
- City of Los Angeles v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1)
- Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Lujan (1)
- Council on Environmental Quality (1)
- DOI (1)
- Department of the Interior (1)
- ECHR (1)
- ECJ (1)
- EIS (1)
- EU (1)
- Economist (1)
- Environmental impact statements (1)
- European Community (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- European Union (1)
- FLPMA (1)
- Federal Land Policy Management Act (1)
- Foundation on Economic Trends v. Lyng (1)
- Greenpeace USA v. Stone (1)
- Kleppe v. Sierra Club (1)
- Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation (1)
- NEPA (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Typology Of Transjudicial Communication, Anne-Marie Slaughter
A Typology Of Transjudicial Communication, Anne-Marie Slaughter
University of Richmond Law Review
Courts are talking to one another all over the world. Mary Ann Glendon describes a "brisk international traffic in ideas about rights," conducted by judges. "In Europe generally," she adds, "and in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, national law is increasingly caught up in a process of cross-fertilization among legal systems."
Agency Action, Finality And Geographical Nexus: Judicial Review Of Agency Compliance With Nepa's Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Requirement After Lujan V. National Wildlife Federation, Matthew C. Porterfield
Agency Action, Finality And Geographical Nexus: Judicial Review Of Agency Compliance With Nepa's Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Requirement After Lujan V. National Wildlife Federation, Matthew C. Porterfield
University of Richmond Law Review
In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the need to address the complex and interrelated impacts that result from human interaction with the environment. One of the most effective tools for evaluating these impacts has been the preparation of programmatic environmental impact statements (EISs) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The status of programmatic EISs, however, has been called into question by the Supreme Court's decision in Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, which has been interpreted by numerous commentators as heralding the end of "programmatic" environmental lawsuits. Even more significantly, Lujan has been …