Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Virginia (2)
- Alito (1)
- American law (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Assimilate (1)
-
- Bond (1)
- Bork (1)
- CLT (1)
- Circuit court (1)
- Clinton (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Counties (1)
- Courts (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Criminal (1)
- DNA (1)
- Damages (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Death sentence (1)
- Declaratory judgment (1)
- Defendants (1)
- Defense (1)
- Dependency (1)
- Eligibility (1)
- English law (1)
- Executions (1)
- Eye witness (1)
- Family law (1)
- Forfeit (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
The History And Scope Of The Virginia Declaratory Judgments Act, Seth M. Land
The History And Scope Of The Virginia Declaratory Judgments Act, Seth M. Land
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corporate And Business Law, Gregory R. Bishop, Laurence V. Parker
Corporate And Business Law, Gregory R. Bishop, Laurence V. Parker
University of Richmond Law Review
In 2005, the Virginia Stock Corporation Act (the "Virginia Act") was extensively revised and updated for the first time since 1985. Having just undertaken such a major revision to the Virginia Act,
the General Assembly further amended the Act in a more targeted fashion in 2006 and 2007. Section II of this article addresses some of the changes that have taken place since the 2005 amendments and gives a brief overview of some conforming changes that have been incorporated in the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act (the "Nonstock Act").
There has also been a concerted effort to conform the language and …
Has A New Day Dawned For Indigent Defense In Virginia?, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
Has A New Day Dawned For Indigent Defense In Virginia?, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pro Se Litigation: Best Practices From A Judge's Perspective, Hon. Beverly W. Snukals, Glen H. Sturtevant Jr.
Pro Se Litigation: Best Practices From A Judge's Perspective, Hon. Beverly W. Snukals, Glen H. Sturtevant Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Issue 2: Annual Survey 2007 Table Of Contents
Issue 2: Annual Survey 2007 Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Native America And The Rule Of Law, Dr. Joe Shirley Jr.
Native America And The Rule Of Law, Dr. Joe Shirley Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Issue 4: Symposium Table Of Contents
Issue 4: Symposium Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pay Now, Execute Later: Why Counties Should Be Required To Post A Bond To Seek The Death Penalty, Adam M. Gershowitz
Pay Now, Execute Later: Why Counties Should Be Required To Post A Bond To Seek The Death Penalty, Adam M. Gershowitz
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bureaucratization And Balkanization: The Origins And Effects Of Decision-Making Norms In The Federal Appellate Courts, Stefanie A. Lindquist
Bureaucratization And Balkanization: The Origins And Effects Of Decision-Making Norms In The Federal Appellate Courts, Stefanie A. Lindquist
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Double Standard In Judicial Selection, Edwin Meese Iii
The Double Standard In Judicial Selection, Edwin Meese Iii
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Promissory Estoppel: The Life History Of An Ideal Legal Transplant, Joel M. Ngugi
Promissory Estoppel: The Life History Of An Ideal Legal Transplant, Joel M. Ngugi
University of Richmond Law Review
This article hopes to accomplish three things. First, it will revisit the historical origins of the doctrine of promissory estoppel in the American law of contracts and the role that Samuel Williston, the Chief Reporter of the Restatement (First) of Contracts ("First Restatement") played in the evolution of the doctrine. The dominant theory is that Williston conceptualized the new promissory estoppel doctrine in a way that retarded and blunted the doctrine shortly after its birth. This theory is adhered to by both critics and proponents of the expansion of promissory estoppel as a ground of promissory obligation. According to both …