Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- Constitutional interpretation (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Appellate courts (1)
-
- Asylum (1)
- Behavior (1)
- Caselaw (1)
- Citations (1)
- Court packing (1)
- Court reform (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Fairness (1)
- INS v. Chadha (1)
- Ideology (1)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service (1)
- Judicial ethics (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judicial misconduct (1)
- Legal sources (1)
- Legislative power (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Risk (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Unpublished opinions (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
What Process Is Due? Courts And Science-Policy Disputes, Gregory B. Heller
What Process Is Due? Courts And Science-Policy Disputes, Gregory B. Heller
Michigan Law Review
A Review of What Process is Due? Courts and Science-Policy Disputes by David M. O'Brien
Ultra-Wrong About The "Ultra-Right", Terry Eastland
Ultra-Wrong About The "Ultra-Right", Terry Eastland
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Packing the Courts: The Conservative Campaign to Rewrite the Constitution by Herman Schwartz
Judicial Review And American Democracy, Stanley S. Sokul
Judicial Review And American Democracy, Stanley S. Sokul
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Judicial Review and American Democracy by Albert P. Melone and George Mace
Outlaw Blues, Suzanna Sherry
Outlaw Blues, Suzanna Sherry
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law by Mark Tushnet
Chadha, Abner J. Mikva
Chadha, Abner J. Mikva
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Chadha by Barbara Hinkson Craig
Siskel And Ebert At The Supreme Court, Thomas E. Baker
Siskel And Ebert At The Supreme Court, Thomas E. Baker
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Redefining the Supreme Court's Role: A Theory of Managing the Federal Judicial Process by Samuel Estreicher and John Sexton
The Myth Of The Disposable Opinion: Unpublished Opinions And Government Litigants In The United States Courts Of Appeals, Lauren K. Robel
The Myth Of The Disposable Opinion: Unpublished Opinions And Government Litigants In The United States Courts Of Appeals, Lauren K. Robel
Michigan Law Review
This article discusses the courts' adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the methods used by the courts to discourage the use of unpublished opinions. It also discusses the results of a survey conducted to determine if, and how, government litigants - some of the chief unanticipated beneficiaries of the publication plans make use of unpublished opinions. Finally, it challenges the assumption that limited publication is essential in an age of caseload crisis.
Regulating Judicial Misconduct And Divining "Good Behavior" For Federal Judges, Harry T. Edwards
Regulating Judicial Misconduct And Divining "Good Behavior" For Federal Judges, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
In recent years, we have witnessed an unprecedented number of instances in which federal judges have been accused of criminal behavior and other serious acts of misconduct. This raises major concerns regarding the scope and enforcement of canons of conduct for members of the judicial branch. It would be presumptuous for anyone to suggest a complete understanding of the notion of "good behavior" for federal judges, or to claim a fully satisfactory prescription for the problem of "judicial misconduct." That is not my object. In reflecting on these issues, however, I have come to realize that I may not share …