Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 6th Amendment (1)
- Australia (1)
- Bennett (1)
- Court jurisdiction (1)
- Court supervisory power (1)
-
- Criminal cases (1)
- Deliberate elicitation (1)
- Due process principles (1)
- Exclusionary remedy (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Extradition Treaty (1)
- False testimony (1)
- Federal criminal justice system (1)
- Fourth Amendenment exclusionary rule (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Governmental conduct (1)
- Individual freedom (1)
- Judicial integrity (1)
- National security (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- Perjury (1)
- Personal freedom (1)
- U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain (1)
- United States Border Patrol (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Border Searches In The Age Of Terrorism, Robert M. Bloom
Border Searches In The Age Of Terrorism, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
This article will first explore the history of border searches. It will look to the reorganization of the border enforcement apparatus resulting from 9/11 as well as the intersection of the Fourth Amendment and border searches generally. Then, it will analyze the Supreme Court's last statement on border searches in the Flores-Montano27 decision, including what impact this decision has had on the lower courts. Finally, the article will focus on Fourth Amendment cases involving terrorism concerns after 9/11, as a means of drawing some conclusions about the effect the emerging emphasis on terrorism and national security concerns will likely have …
Jailhouse Informants, Robert M. Bloom
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
A court can invalidate or rectify certain kinds of offensive official action on the grounds of judicial integrity. In the past, it has served as a check on overzealous law enforcement agents whose actions so seriously impaired due process principles that they shocked the bench’s conscience. The principle not only preserves the judiciary as a symbol of lawfulness and justice, but it also insulates the courts from becoming aligned with illegal actors and their bad acts. The 1992 case of U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain, however, may have signaled a departure from past practices. This article reviews current Supreme Court cases and …